To determine which statement about art best captures the arguments made in the passage, we need to analyze the key ideas presented. The passage discusses the impact of digital technology on art accessibility and preservation, emphasizing the challenges faced with digital media. These include:
Considering these points, the statement that art, created and stored digitally, becomes less accessible due to technology changes and host platform decisions effectively captures the passage's essence. Therefore, the correct answer is:
As art is increasingly created, stored and distributed digitally, access to it is counterintuitively likely to be made more difficult by the rapid churn in technology and the whims of host platforms.
The passage discusses the control over access to digital content, emphasizing issues with digital rights, storage conditions, and the uncertainty of maintaining access to such content over time. The main argument presents challenges associated with streaming services and digital purchases, suggesting that they do not guarantee permanent access to content.
To invalidate this argument, a statement must present a solution that directly addresses and resolves the concerns of access and permanence. The correct option asserts that "Studios and streaming services have committed to giving customers perpetual and platform-independent access to the original digital content they have paid for."
This statement effectively invalidates the main argument by guaranteeing both perpetual and unfettered access to digital content, removing concerns about accessibility, rights management, and the risk of content disappearing or becoming obsolete. Such a commitment changes the dynamic described in the passage where content availability is uncertain and controlled by external factors.
Based on the given passage, the statement "Back then, at least, cinema was defined by its ephemerality: the sense that a film was as good as gone once it left your local cinema" suggests that in the past, films were considered to be transient and temporary because their availability was limited to their showing time in local cinemas. Once a film completed its run in theaters, it was essentially inaccessible to the public, thus emphasizing its ephemeral nature.
In contrast, the selected sentence implies that the current situation has changed. Today, the nature of films has shifted; they are no longer tied exclusively to their run in local cinemas due to advancements in technology such as streaming services and digital media. This development has led to films being expected to be accessible for a much longer duration. With this context, the correct option that aligns with the suggested statement is:
Today, films are expected to be available for a long time, since they are no longer tied solely to their stay at the local cinema.
This option captures the essence of the shift from the transient nature of films in the past to their more permanent availability today due to innovations in film distribution and preservation.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."