The passage discusses the shift in how access to art is controlled, particularly as it relates to digital platforms. The text focuses on how technological advancements and changes in platform policies (such as streaming services and digital rights management) complicate and limit access to art over time. It highlights that digital formats, while offering convenience, may also make access to art increasingly difficult due to the evolving nature of technology and shifting corporate decisions.
Therefore, Option 4 aligns most closely with the passage’s argument.
The example of Netflix editing old episodes of “Stranger Things” illustrates the fears that digital platforms might alter or manipulate art after its release, making it less trustworthy as custodians of cultural works. It highlights concerns over streaming services changing original works and manipulating access, which is why Option 1 is the correct answer.
The passage discusses the instability of digital access to films and the risks posed by platform policies, data decay, and technological obsolescence. If studios and streaming services committed to giving customers perpetual and platform-independent access to digital content, this would directly counter the concerns raised in the passage, making Option 4 the best answer.
The sentence in question highlights how cinema once had a brief, ephemeral existence – once films left the theater, they were often gone forever. Today, with digital storage and streaming, films are no longer constrained by this temporality and can be expected to remain accessible long after they leave the cinema, making Option 3 the most accurate interpretation.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."