According to the author, some source countries value archaeological sites because they can gain from new discoveries in archaeology, one of which is that these discoveries usually result in an increase in tourism.
In addition to boosting cultural pride and maybe attracting tourists to examine archaeological sites, the section highlights the economic and cultural benefits of tourism. This point is presented appropriately in Option C. It is not possible to regard any of the other options as legal conclusions.
The passage's main point is that, given their widespread support, strict rules protecting cultural property may make it less attractive for international organizations to fund archeological research abroad.
According to the passage, the decrease in incentives may have a negative impact on archeological discoveries and, in turn, on tourism and national pride in the nations of origin. The idea that there is outside financial backing for archeological research in these countries is introduced in Option D, the only one of the provided possibilities that would counter the main idea.
If this is the case, the absence of findings may be due to an entirely unrelated component or variable that the author neglected to take into consideration.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?