Option B is the correct choice since the passage uses examples such as those of the Inuit and Aboriginal Australians to demonstrate how physical conditions, notably environmental factors, shape human behavior and cultural norms. The narrative delves into the emergence of insulated fur attire among the Inuit due to Arctic conditions and the absence of indigenous agriculture in Aboriginal Australia owing to the dearth of domesticable local species. These instances underscore how physical conditions wield influence over certain facets of human conduct and mold cultural adjustments. Consequently, Option B accurately captures the main idea conveyed by the examples provided in the passage.
Option D lacks explicit emphasis within the passage, which concentrates more on the impact of environmental factors on behavior and cultures.
Option A: The passage does not expressly address self-sufficiency but rather elucidates the influence of specific environmental factors on societal development.
Option C is not entirely erroneous, yet Option B more precisely captures the focus on physical conditions shaping human behavior and cultures within the framework of the provided examples.
So, the correct option is (B): how physical circumstances can dictate human behaviour and cultures.
Option A: The author notes that certain geographical explanations proposed a century ago carried racial undertones, leading to a tarnishing of all geographical theories by association with racism in the eyes of many scholars.
Option B: The author analyzes the present state of agricultural methodologies in Australia, highlighting that the agricultural produce and livestock contributing to Australia's status as a food and wool exporter today primarily comprise non-native species (predominantly Eurasian) introduced to the continent by foreign settlers. The usage of "non-native" suggests a departure in agricultural practices from the original flora and fauna indigenous to Australia.
Option C: The author examines the evolution of insulated fur garments among the Inuit populace residing north of the Arctic Circle, attributing it not to a specific individual decision or historical circumstance in 1783, but rather as a reaction to environmental stimuli.
Option D cannot be directly extrapolated from the passage. While the text does delve into the impact of both geographical elements (such as biogeography) and non-geographical factors (including culture, history, and individual decisions) on human phenomena, it does not explicitly quantify or compare the predominance of these influences by asserting that "most human phenomena stem from culture and individual choice."
So, the correct option is (D): while most human phenomena result from culture and individual choice, some have biogeographic origins.
Option B is not explicitly presented by the author as a rationale for the dismissal of geographic influences by non-geographers. The author implies that scholars often react unfavorably to explanations involving geography by condemning "geographic determinism." However, the specific notion of dismissal is not overtly articulated in the passage.
On the other hand, the remaining options can be inferred from the text:
Option A can be inferred from the following passage: "Another reason for reflex rejection of geographic explanations is that historians have a tradition, in their discipline, of stressing the role of contingency (a favorite word among historians) based on individual decisions and chance."
Option C can be deduced from the following excerpt: "One reason is that some geographic explanations advanced a century ago were racist, thereby causing all geographic explanations to become tainted."
Option D can be derived from the concluding paragraph of the passage: "Geographic explanations usually depend on detailed technical facts of geography and other fields of scholarship... Most historians and economists don't acquire that detailed knowledge as part of the professional training."
So, the correct option is (B): dismissal of explanations that involve geographical causes for human behaviour.
The passage does not directly address scholars' critique for maintaining antiquated interpretations of historical and cultural occurrences. The author primarily critiques scholars for their inclination to overlook geographical elements, categorize geographic explanations as deterministic, and link geographic analyses to historical racism.
So, the correct option is (B): their outdated interpretations of past cultural and historical phenomena.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |