postcolonial novels : Border-crossing
Postcolonial novels : Border-crossing
The statement asserts that books from the Indian Ocean and mainstream English-language fiction are distinct and take place in different universes.
Option B supports the passage’s assertion—if true, it highlights the contrast by showing that mainstream English-language novels have historically privileged the Christian, white, male experience of travel and adventure.
If accurate, none of the other statements strengthen the passage’s argument.
If the Orientalist perception of Africa’s cultural coarseness drives the majority of Indian Ocean novels’ depictions of the continent, then Option C undermines the passage’s assertion by aligning these works with mainstream fiction.
According to the text, American and European metropolitan centers have historically served as the backdrop for most mainstream English-language books. Option D, if accurate, undermines the contrast drawn by the passage.
The passage claims that the portrayal of Africa in Indian Ocean novels is not idealized. Option A, if true, does not support the passage’s distinction.
Therefore, the correct option is (B): most mainstream English-language novels have historically privileged the Christian, white, male experience of travel and adventure.
The chapter makes no mention of or suggests anything about the migration networks that linked the global north and south over the Indian Ocean region. It is not true that Option D is incorrect.
Option C is accurate. Because it was easier to travel by sea than by land for a large portion of history, port cities located far apart were frequently more easily connected to one another than they were to much closer interior communities.
Option A is also true. As stated in the paragraph, the Indian Ocean world refers to a distinct set of histories and geographical areas compared to those commonly seen in English-language fiction, which “assume a background of Christianity and whiteness, and cite places like Paris and New York.” A predominantly Islamic space can be found in the networked cities of the global south.
Option D is accurate as well. “Migration is often a matter of force; travel is portrayed as abandonment rather than adventure, freedoms are kept from women, and slavery is rife,” the paragraph says in reference to migration in the Indian Ocean region.
Therefore, Option D is the correct response.
The passage refers to the "Indian Ocean world" as the interconnected oceanic region of the global south, which includes East Africa, the coasts of the Arab world, South and East Asia, and other regions. These linkages are long-lasting and are made possible by maritime traffic in the Indian Ocean.
According to the passage, white Europeans were not the only ones involved in early international trade and commerce; the global south was also the first hub of globalization: "historical and archaeological evidence suggests that what we now call globalisation first appeared in the Indian Ocean".
The passage also critiques common global imaginaries: "Those [commonly found ones] are mostly centered in Europe or the US, assume a background of Christianity and whiteness, and mention places like Paris and New York."
Instead, the novels referenced in the book highlight a fundamentally Islamic space. Thus, Options A, C, and D are accurate.
Option B is incorrect as it contradicts the message conveyed in the passage.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."