Question:

The Parliament enacts the "Fair Housing Act, 2024", which includes provisions:
(1) Section 3 prohibits discrimination in renting or selling houses based on religion, caste, or gender.
(2) Section 6 imposes a penalty of ₹10,000 for discrimination.
(3) Section 10 makes it mandatory for landlords to disclose the religious background of all tenants in the previous 10 years.
A citizen challenges Section 10, arguing violation of right to privacy under Article 21. The Supreme Court declares Section 10 unconstitutional but upholds other provisions. What principle did the Court apply?

Show Hint

If part of a law is unconstitutional but separable, the rest survives.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
  • Doctrine of Severability
  • Doctrine of Basic Structure
  • Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
  • Doctrine of Eclipse
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The doctrine of severability allows courts to strike down unconstitutional parts of a law while retaining valid portions. Here, Section 10 was severed for violating privacy, while Sections 3 and 6 remained in force. This balances invalid and valid provisions within one statute.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0