Step 1: Understand the bleaching action of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). NaOCl is an oxidizing agent. Its bleaching and degrading effects on cotton (cellulose) are due to oxidation.
Step 2: Analyze the chemistry of NaOCl at different pH values. The active species in a hypochlorite solution changes with pH.
- In alkaline conditions (pH 9-11), the dominant species is the hypochlorite ion (OCl\(^-\)). This is a relatively slow and controlled oxidizing agent, which is why commercial bleaching is done in this range.
- In acidic conditions (pH < 5), chlorine gas (Cl\(_2\)) can be released, and the primary species is hypochlorous acid (HOCl).
- At neutral or near-neutral pH (pH 7-8), there is a maximum concentration of the undissociated hypochlorous acid (HOCl). Hypochlorous acid is a much more powerful and aggressive oxidizing agent than the hypochlorite ion.
Step 3: Relate the active species to cellulose damage. Because hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is the most potent oxidizing agent in the system, the maximum rate of cellulose degradation (damage or tendering) occurs at the pH where its concentration is highest. This is the neutral pH range of 7 to 8. For this reason, bleaching is always avoided in this pH range.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |