The light fastness of azoic dyed material decreases mainly due to \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Understand Azoic dyeing. Azoic dyes (or naphthol dyes) are formed directly inside the fiber by reacting two components: a Naphthol component and a Diazonium salt (base).
Step 2: Understand light fastness. Light fastness refers to a dye's ability to resist fading when exposed to light. Fading is a photochemical reaction that destroys dye molecules.
Step 3: Analyze how the options affect light fastness.
- (A) Depth of color: For most dye classes, including azoics, light fastness is highly dependent on concentration. In pale shades (low depth of color), there are fewer dye molecules on the surface. When a certain number of molecules are destroyed by light, the color change is very noticeable. In deep shades, the same number of destroyed molecules represents a much smaller fraction of the total, so the color change is less apparent. Therefore, light fastness is generally much poorer in pale shades and improves with the depth of color. The question asks what causes it to decrease, so a low depth of color is a major reason.
- (B) Type of fabric / (D) Type of substrate: While the substrate can have some effect (e.g., the chemical environment), it's a less dominant factor than the concentration of the dye itself.
- (C) Humidity: Humidity can influence the rate of photochemical degradation for some dyes, but again, the depth of shade is a more universal and significant factor.
Conclusion: The most significant factor influencing the decrease in light fastness for a given azoic dye is a lower depth of color (i.e., dyeing in pale shades).
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |