Question:

“The human soul is immaterial. What is not matter is not spatial and hence not vulnerable to motion. Evidently, no motion implies no dissolution. Therefore the human soul is immortal.” One premise is missing. Complete the argument.

Show Hint

When an argument ends with a categorical claim, look for a needed universal rule that links the penultimate property to the final conclusion.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Nothing is free from dissolution
  • What is incorruptible is immortal
  • There is no motion
  • Matter does not exist
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The argument in the question seeks to establish that the human soul is immortal. The logical flow of the argument is as follows:

  1. Premise 1: The human soul is immaterial.
  2. Premise 2: What is not matter is not spatial and hence not vulnerable to motion.
  3. Premise 3: Evidently, no motion implies no dissolution.
  4. Conclusion: Therefore the human soul is immortal.

The argument is missing a crucial link between the concept of dissolution and immortality. The premise that bridges this gap should associate the idea of not being subject to dissolution with being immortal. Among the given options, the statement “What is incorruptible is immortal” provides this essential connection:

  1. Added Premise: What is incorruptible is immortal.

By including this premise, the argument becomes logically complete. It shows that if the human soul is immune to dissolution (incorruptible) due to its immaterial nature, it must therefore be immortal.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions