The Energy Conservation Act in India was passed in which year?
Show Hint
- 2004
- 2001
- 2005
- 2010
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
The Energy Conservation Act was enacted in India in 2001. However, the Energy Conservation Act of 2005 focused on the creation of an institutional framework for promoting energy efficiency in the country. The act gave a push to energy conservation in various sectors.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (1) 2004: Incorrect. The act was passed in 2001 but its provisions began being implemented in 2005.
- (2) 2001: Incorrect. While the Act was created in 2001, it took until 2005 for full implementation.
- (3) 2005: Correct. The Energy Conservation Act became operational in 2005.
- (4) 2010: Incorrect, as this was not when the Act was passed or implemented.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (3) 2005.
Top Questions on Contemporary World Politics
- The salient features of hybrid regimes are:
A. They suffer weaknesses in political culture and in the functioning of government.
B. The government pressure on opposition party and candidates are common.
C. Civil society and rule of law are weak.
D. Once elected, the government shows full sense of constitutional restraints.
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Political Science
- Contemporary World Politics
- Match the LIST-I with LIST-II.
LIST-I
(Forms of Political Participation)LIST-II
(Participants)A. Conventional participation III. Voting in elections B. Less conventional participation I. Signing petitions C. Illegal participation II. Political violence, including terrorism and assassination D. Public opinion as a form of participation IV. Public concerns by the members of an affected community - CUET (PG) - 2025
- Political Science
- Contemporary World Politics
- Which approach of Comparative Politics focuses on the ‘interests of actors’?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Political Science
- Contemporary World Politics
- Who developed the 'Gaia hypothesis'?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Political Science
- Contemporary World Politics
- Write about Non-Alignment Movement – Belgrade Conference
- Maharashtra Class XII - 2025
- History
- Contemporary World Politics
Questions Asked in CUET PG exam
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Contract Law
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Judicial Process
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Administrative Law