When working with linear objective functions in optimization problems, the slope of the objective function can provide useful insights. The key is to match the slope of the objective function with the slope of the constraint or boundary line to maximize or minimize the objective. This technique is particularly useful in linear programming problems where the goal is to optimize a linear function subject to certain constraints. Always ensure that you equate the slopes carefully when solving such problems.
The given linear programming problem involves finding the condition on α and β such that the maximum value of the objective function \( Z = \alpha x + \beta y \) occurs at the corner points (5, 5) and (0, 20) of the feasible region. To solve this, we analyze the given corner points of the feasible region: (0,10), (5,5), (5,15), and (0,30).
First, compare the Z values at the corner points (5,5) and (0,20):
Now, equate \( Z_1 \) and \( Z_2 \) since Z maximum occurs at both these points:
5α+5β=20β
Rearranging gives:
5α=15β
Simplifying:
α=3β
Therefore, the condition on α and β is α = 3β.
The slope of the objective function \( Z = \alpha x + \beta y \) is given by the formula:
\[ \text{Slope of the objective function} = -\frac{\alpha}{\beta}. \] In order to maximize \( Z \), the slope of the objective function must match the slope of the line passing through the given points (5, 5) and (0, 20).
Step 1: Calculate the slope of the line passing through the points (5, 5) and (0, 20):
The slope of a line passing through two points \( (x_1, y_1) \) and \( (x_2, y_2) \) is given by the formula: \[ \text{Slope} = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1} \] Substituting the given points (5, 5) and (0, 20): \[ \text{Slope} = \frac{20 - 5}{0 - 5} = \frac{15}{-5} = -3. \]
Step 2: Equate the slope of the objective function with the slope of the line:
The slope of the objective function is \( -\frac{\alpha}{\beta} \), and we want it to be equal to the slope of the line, which is \( -3 \). Therefore, we have the equation: \[ -\frac{\alpha}{\beta} = -3. \]
Step 3: Solve for \( \alpha \):
Simplifying the equation: \[ \frac{\alpha}{\beta} = 3 \implies \alpha = 3\beta. \]
Conclusion: Thus, the correct answer is \( \alpha = 3\beta \).
A person wants to invest at least ₹20,000 in plan A and ₹30,000 in plan B. The return rates are 9% and 10% respectively. He wants the total investment to be ₹80,000 and investment in A should not exceed investment in B. Which of the following is the correct LPP model (maximize return $ Z $)?