Option A states that socially existing beings, unlike the art of Michelangelo or Leonardo, cannot be analyzed. However, the passage indicates that even for Michelangelo and Leonardo, no amount of social analysis is deemed sufficient because of their vast artistic contributions. Moreover, the passage implies that while social analysis may fall short for such towering figures, it could still be applied to other beings who don't possess their exceptional genius.
Option B states that Michelangelo or Leonardo cannot be subjected to social analysis due to their genius. However, this is inaccurate, as the passage doesn't assert that they cannot be analyzed socially but rather suggests that no amount of analysis does justice to their brilliance.
Option C states that there are no analyses of Michelangelo's or Leonardo's social accounts. Yet, the passage doesn't address this aspect, so this option is not relevant to the discussion.
So, the correct answer is (D): Social analytical accounts of people like Michelangelo or Leonardo cannot explain their genius.
Option A states: "Sight as a meaningful visual experience is possible when there is a foundational condition established in images of covenants." This option distorts the original statement by suggesting that meaningful visual experience is only possible when images are associated with covenants. However, the original statement does not limit meaningful visual experiences to this specific condition.
Option B states: "Images are meaningful visual experiences when they have a foundation of covenants seeing them." This option misinterprets the original statement, which emphasizes that sight becomes a meaningful visual experience when images are associated with covenants. There is no discussion about the meaningfulness of images themselves.
Option C accurately encapsulates the key points without misinterpretation. Therefore, it is the correct answer.
Option D state: "The way we experience sight is through images operated on by meaningful covenants." This option strays from the context of the original statement, which focuses on meaningful visual experiences rather than meaningful covenants
So, the correct answer is (C): Sight becomes a meaningful visual experience because of covenants of meaningfulness that we establish with the images we see.
This question is straightforward and relies on facts. Please read the passage attentively. Imagery can be deduced from the second paragraph, and subsequent paragraphs provide information about Visual Practices, Lifeworlds, and Structures of Perception, as mentioned in the penultimate paragraph.
So, the correct answer is (C): Imagery, Visual Practices, Lifeworlds, Structures of Perception.
Option A claims that "studying visual culture requires institutional structures without which the structures of perception cannot be analyzed." However, upon reviewing the penultimate paragraph of the question, it states that "Vision is a socially and a biologically constructed operation, depending on the design of the human body and how it engages the interpretive devices developed by a culture in order to see intelligibly." This indicates that studying visual culture relies on both the design of the human body and the interpretative devices developed by the culture. There is no mention of the necessity of institutional structures for analyzing vision. Therefore, this inference is incorrect. The remaining three options are accurate.
So, the correct answer is (A): studying visual culture requires institutional structures without which the structures of perception cannot be analysed.
This is a vocab question. The term "epiphenomena" refers to "a secondary effect or byproduct." The option "Phenomena supplemental to the evidence" closely matches this definition, making it the correct answer.
So, the correct answer is (C): Phenomena supplemental to the evidence.
Passage: Toru Dutt is considered the earliest Indian female writer in English. She travelled extensively in Europe from a young age with her family. She and her sister Aru became fascinated with Paris and French literature. In London, they came in contact with such august personages such as Sir Bartle Frere, the Gover- nor of Bombay from 1862 to 1867, and Sir Edward Ryan, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Calcutta, from 1837 to 1843. Toru Dutt was greatly influenced in her writings by French Romantic poets like Victor Hugo and English writers like Elizabeth Browning, John Keats, Charlotte Bronte and Jane Austen. She was also intrigued by the legends and myths of India, and even learned Sanskrit. Her writings were marked by romantic melancholia and an obsession and preoccupation with death. This was partly due to her suffering and pain following the early tragic deaths of her siblings, especially her older sister Aru, with whom she was quite close. Her chosen subjects often portrayed separation, loneliness, captivity, dejec- tion, declining seasons and untimely death. She led an ”Ivory Tower existence” and her own death came quite early, at the age of 21, in the full bloom of her talent and on the eve of the awakening of her genius. Toru Dutt’s most famous work is A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields, an anthology of poems translated from French to English. It also contained a few original poems that showcase her vast insight into French literature. She used to publish poems in the Bengal Magazine, under the pseudonym ”TD”. But most of her powerful work was published posthumously, in- cluding the French novel Le Journal de Mademoiselle D’Arvers and the unfinished English novel Bianca, or, the Young Spanish Maiden. Her work Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan depicts a shrewd knowledge of Hindu mythology and an instinctive empathy with the conditions of life they represent. An assimilation of the Occident and the Orient nourished Toru’s poetic skills; in her, we find a tripartite influence of a French education, lectures at Cambridge and the study of Sanskrit literature.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.”
(From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?