Note: The wiring in the diagram is ambiguous. We will proceed with the most standard interpretation of the MUX symbols and connections.
Step 1: Analyze the first multiplexer (MUX 1).
The select line is the bottom input, which is connected to signal B.
The data input for select=0 is C.
The data input for select=1 is \(\overline{C}\).
The output equation for this MUX, let's call it \(O_1\), is: \(O_1 = \overline{B} \cdot C + B \cdot \overline{C} = B \oplus C\).
Step 2: Analyze the second multiplexer (MUX 2).
The select line is connected to signal A.
The data input for select=0 is 0.
The data input for select=1 is the output of the first MUX, \(O_1\).
The final output equation f is: \(f = \overline{A} \cdot 0 + A \cdot O_1 = A \cdot O_1\).
Step 3: Substitute the expression for \(O_1\) into the equation for f.
\[ f = A \cdot (B \oplus C) = A \cdot (\overline{B}C + B\overline{C}) \]
\[ f = A\overline{B}C + AB\overline{C} \]
This result does not match any of the provided options exactly as written, suggesting an error in the question's diagram or options. However, if we re-examine option B, which is \(AB\overline{C} + A\overline{B}\overline{C}\), it is very close to our derived expression. It seems likely there is a typo in the provided options. Based on a standard interpretation of the circuit, our derived expression is correct.