Step 1: Understanding earthquake-resistant design.
In earthquake-resistant design, structures are expected to behave in a ductile manner. The failure mechanism should ensure life safety, meaning beams should form plastic hinges rather than columns, so that collapse can be avoided.
Step 2: Strong Column – Weak Beam Concept.
If columns are stronger and beams are weaker, the plastic hinges form in the beams, which can redistribute loads and dissipate energy without sudden failure.
Step 3: Why not other options?
- (A) Weak column – Strong beam: This causes column failure, leading to sudden collapse (undesirable).
- (C) Strong column – Strong beam: Impractical in design, uneconomical.
- (D) Weak column – Weak beam: Dangerous and unsafe.
Step 4: Conclusion.
The correct design philosophy is Strong column – Weak beam.
Sequentially arrange the reactions of observers and type of damage during an earthquake in the increasing order of earthquake intensity measured at Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale.
A. Earthquake is felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Damage: No damage. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.
B. Everyone runs outdoors. Noticed by persons driving motor cars. Damage: Considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures.
C. Earthquake is not felt except by a few people under especially favorable circumstances. Damage: No damage.
D. Earthquake is felt by nearly everyone, many awakened. Damage: Some dishes, windows broken, few cracks in plaster, unstable objects overturned.