Step 1: Understanding the Concept
This is an inference question. Based on the likely topic, the passage probably draws a parallel between the decision-making flaws of individuals and those of governments to explain the concept of present bias.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation
The passage likely uses the well-understood concept of individual present bias (e.g., failing to save for retirement for a small immediate reward) as an analogy to explain governmental present bias.
(A) suggests a contrast ("unlike individuals"), but the core idea is likely a similarity.
(B) makes a specific claim about the root cause (political vs. economic) that might be true but is less likely to be the main point of the *comparison* itself.
(D) is a judgment about the scale of harm. While likely true, the author's primary goal in the comparison is probably to explain the *mechanism* of the bias, not just quantify its impact.
(E) is a statement about a structural cause of government bias, not a direct comparison to individual bias.
(C) establishes a direct and fundamental parallel: the core reason for the bias—a preference for immediate, certain rewards over delayed, uncertain ones—is the same for both individuals and governments. This is a very typical way to structure such an argument.
Step 3: Final Answer
Option (C) is the most plausible inference, as it describes the foundational similarity that would justify comparing individual and governmental present bias in the first place.