Production in year \(2000 = 17213 × 83.2 = \text {Rs.} \ 14,32,121.6\)
Production in year \(2003 = 12338 × 113 = \text {Rs.} \ 13,94,194\)
Now, % Change in production,
\( = \frac {13,94,194-14,32,121.6}{14,32,121.6} \times 100\)
\(= -2.6\%\)
\(≃ 3\%\)
So, the correct option is (A): \(-3\%\).
Percentage Change in productivity \(= \frac {113-83.2}{83.2} \times 100 = 35.8 \%\) (Maximum)
Percentage Change in workforce \(= \frac {17213-12338}{17213} \times 100 = 28.3\%\)
Production in year \(2000 = 17213 \times 83.2 = Rs.\ 14,32,121.6\)
Production in year \(2003 = 12338 × 113 = Rs.\ 13,94,194\)
% Change in production \(= \frac {14,32,121.6-13,94,194}{14,32,121.6} \times 100 = 2.6\%\)
So, the correct option is (B): Productivity.
Workforce is directly proportional to production, indicating that both have followed the same trend. Both experienced a percentage decline between 2000 and 2003.
So, the correct option is (B): Workforce and production.
country | 2005(in '00 cases) | 2006(Rate per 10,000) | 2007(in '00 cases) |
A | 53 | 0.1 | 46 |
B | 345 | 2.1 | 145 |
C | 87 | 1.1 | 39 |
D | 81 | 33.9 | 26 |
E | 84 | 0.8 | 23 |
F | 1365 | 0..9 | 209 |
G | 661 | 13.0 | 239 |
H | 516 | 1.9 | 236 |
J | 36 | 0.2 | 16 |
K | 95 | 1.8 | 23 |
L | 262 | 3.9 | 156 |
M | 19 | 0.0 | 18 |
N | 1862 | 3.3 | 563 |
P | 47 | 56.2 | 11 |
Q | 49 | 0.5 | 18 |
R | 337 | 5.0 | 235 |
S | 61 | 1.2 | 35 |
T | 17 | 0.3 | 12 |
U | 896 | 1.5 | 235 |
V | 39 | 1.4 | 14 |
W | 31 | 0.0 | 5 |
X | 501 | 0.6 | 12 |
Y | 217 | 1.4 | 73 |
Z | 31 | 0.9 | 22 |
AA | 39 | 0.8 | 13 |
AB | 46 | 0.4 | 35 |
AC | 48 | 0.1 | 21 |
AD | 71 | 0.8 | 32 |
AE | 162 | 2.4 | 83 |
AF | 655 | 1.1 | 241 |
AG | 21,861 | 8.9 | 6445 |
AH | 869 | 1.4 | 219 |
AJ | 19 | 0.0 | 13 |
All countries that have reported more than five hundred cancers to the WHO in 2007 are listed here. The left column gives the total number of cases reported by each country for 2006, the middle column gives the 2006 rate (cancer cases per 10,000 population) and the last column shows the number of cases reported in early 2007.
Most of the 2007 reports were for only the first quarter of the year. Owing to reporting delays of six months or more, cases reported in 2007 actually were diagnosed in 2006.