Step 1: Understanding the Argument.
The argument suggests that a decline in the football team's performance will lead to a decrease in alumni contributions. This implies that alumni contributions are related to the team's performance, specifically its record. The assumption is that alumni are more likely to contribute if the team is successful.
Step 2: Analysis of Options.
- (A) The college's reputation for academic excellence depends on the performance of its football team: Incorrect. The argument does not say that academic excellence itself depends on the football team's performance, only that alumni contributions are linked to the team's success.
- (B) Contributions from alumni are needed for the college to produce a winning football team: Incorrect. The argument focuses on alumni contributions decreasing due to poor performance, but it does not suggest that these contributions are necessary for the team's success.
- (C) Struthers alumni contributions depend to an extent on a winning record by the college's football team: Correct. This option directly addresses the assumption that alumni contributions are tied to the football team's performance, which is central to the argument.
- (D) The college's football team will continue its losing streak next year: Incorrect. The argument does not assume this, only that the team's performance this year has led to a decline in alumni contributions. It does not predict next year's performance.
- (E) As a group, the college's alumni will have at least as much discretionary money to give away next year as this year: Incorrect. The argument does not assume that the amount of money alumni have available will remain the same; it focuses on the link between contributions and team performance.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C) Struthers alumni contributions depend to an extent on a winning record by the college's football team.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{(C) \, \text{Struthers alumni contributions depend to an extent on a winning record by the college's football team.}} \]
Aarya had always been a mediocre student. Luckily, after finishing her undergraduate degree from a tier-two engineering college, she secured a decent but modestly paying job at a reputable IT company.
However, after a year on the job, Aarya found her role mundane. When her best friend at the company, Shruti, left to pursue an MBA from a top-tier business school, citing significant career growth and potential salary increase upon graduation, Aarya felt intrigued and inspired to follow the same path. Shruti appreciated Aarya’s aspirations, telling her that doing an MBA from a top-tier business school could not only land Aarya a lucrative job but also it could fast-track her career progression. However, Aarya was concerned whether she would be able to balance between her MBA entrance exam preparation and her current job. Aarya considered resigning to focus entirely on MBA entrance exam preparation, but Shruti cautioned her that top-tier business schools might view a career break unfavourably, as they prefer continuous professional engagement.
Statement: All poets are sensitive people. Some sensitive people are not artists.
Conclusion I: Some poets are not artists.
Conclusion II: Some sensitive people may be poets.
Choose the correct option:
All poets are dreamers.
Some dreamers are not realists.
Therefore, which of the following must be true?
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)