Step 1: Understand the constitutional provisions related to Article 19.
Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees certain fundamental freedoms to citizens, such as freedom of speech, assembly, and movement. These rights are essential for democratic functioning and individual liberty.
Step 2: Suspension of rights during an emergency.
According to Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution, the right to freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order, sovereignty, and integrity of India. However, during an emergency, the fundamental rights are not automatically suspended under external aggression or war.
Step 3: Analyze the ground for suspension of Article 19.
The Constitution allows the right to freedom to be automatically suspended only during the proclamation of an emergency due to "external aggression" or "war," NOT when an emergency is declared due to "Loss of Election."
Step 4: Conclusion. - Therefore, the correct answer is Loss of Election (Option 3), as that condition does not automatically lead to the suspension of rights under Article 19.
I may here trace the history of the shaping of the Preamble because this would show that the Preamble was in conformity with the Constitution as it was finally accepted. Not only was the Constitution framed in the light of the Preamble but the Preamble was ultimately settled in the light of the Constitution. In the earliest draft the Preamble was something formal and read: "We, the people of India, seeking to promote the common good, do hereby, through our chosen representatives, enact, adopt and give to ourselves this Constitution." After the plan of June 3, 1947, which led to the decision to partition the country and to set up two independent Dominions of India and Pakistan, on June 8, 1947, a joint sub-committee of the Union Constitution and Provincial Constitution Committees, took note that the objective resolution would require amendment in view of the latest announcement of the British Government. The announcement of June 3 had made it clear that full independence, in the form of Dominion Status, would be conferred on India as from August 15, 1947. After examining the implications of partition the sub-committee thought that the question of making changes in the Objectives Resolution could appropriately be considered only when effect had actually been given to the June 3 Plan. Later on July 12, 1947, the special sub-committee again postponed consideration of the matter. The Union Constitution Committee provisionally accepted the Preamble as drafted by B.N. Rao and reproduced it in its report of July 4, 1947 without any change, with the tacit recognition at that stage that the Preamble would be finally based on the Objectives Resolution. In a statement circulated to members of the Assembly on July 18, 1947 Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru inter alia, observed that the Preamble was covered more or less by the Objectives Resolution which it was intended to incorporate in the final Constitution, subject to some modification on account of the political changes resulting from partition. (327 words) [Extracted with edits and revision from B Shiva Rao's - Framing of India's Constitution]