Read the given statement and arguments carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given arguments logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement: Should all members of parliament be highly qualified in India?
Arguments:
I. A highly qualified person is honest.
II. They will understand the real problems of people.
III. No, the number of highly qualified people is very low in India. Therefore, this statement is against Indian democracy.
Statement: Should all members of parliament be highly qualified in India?
Arguments:
I. A highly qualified person is honest.
II. They will understand the real problems of people.
III. No, the number of highly qualified people is very low in India. Therefore, this statement is against Indian democracy.
Show Hint
- Only I follows
- Only III follows
- I and II follow
- Only II follows
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
We are given a statement in the form of a question and three arguments. We need to evaluate which argument(s) are strong and logically support the idea presented in the statement. The statement proposes that all members of parliament (MPs) in India should be highly qualified.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze each argument:
Argument I: A highly qualified person is honest.
This is a sweeping generalization. There is no direct or proven correlation between high qualifications and honesty. A person's honesty is a moral attribute, not an academic one. Therefore, this is a weak argument.
Argument II: They will understand the real problems of people.
This argument suggests that higher qualifications could equip MPs with better analytical skills and a deeper understanding of complex socio-economic issues. This would enable them to formulate better policies and solve the real problems of the people more effectively. This is a strong and logical argument in favor of the statement.
Argument III: No, the number of highly qualified people is very low in India. Therefore, this statement is against Indian democracy.
This is a counter-argument. It brings in an external fact (scarcity of highly qualified people) and claims that mandating high qualifications for MPs would be undemocratic because it would restrict the pool of eligible candidates. While it is a valid point for debate, the question asks which argument logically *follows from* or supports the statement. This argument opposes the statement. Furthermore, the argument makes a logical leap by equating a restrictive qualification with being "against Indian democracy," which is debatable. For the purpose of finding an argument that *supports* the statement, this one is invalid.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Based on the analysis, only Argument II provides a strong and logical reason to support the statement. Argument I is a weak generalization, and Argument III is a counter-argument. Therefore, only argument II logically follows.
Top Questions on Statements and Arguments
- Introducing cycling lanes reduces minor collisions in a district. Which of the following more strongly supports the causal link between these events?
- AILET BALLB (Hons.) - 2026
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Arguments
- The government announced subsidies for electric vehicles (EVs) to encourage consumers to buy more EVs. However, sales of EVs remained stagnant. Which of the following, if true, would best explain the outcome?
- AILET BALLB (Hons.) - 2026
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Arguments
- Public health officials warn that air pollution increases the risk of respiratory disease. A recent drop in pollution levels coincided with a fall in new respiratory disease cases. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the officials’ warning?
- AILET BALLB (Hons.) - 2026
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Arguments
- An econometric study using the difference-in-differences technique finds no significant employment effect from a minimum-wage hike. Which evidence most strengthens this finding?
- AILET BALLB (Hons.) - 2026
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Arguments
- Diversity may bring people to the same room, but inclusion ensures that every voice is heard, valued, and allowed to shape the conversation. It demands that institutions go beyond representation to transformation, to question who holds the power, who defines norms, and whose stories remain unheard. It is the process of turning the promise of democracy into practice, one case, one reform, and one act of courage at a time.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author's argument in the passage above?- AILET BALLB (Hons.) - 2026
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Arguments
Questions Asked in SRCC GBO exam
Read the given passage and answer the questions.
For those of us without access to outside green space, houseplants are a stylish and affordable way of getting a nature fix. Alongside looking nice, indoor plants actually have several other perks- the biggest benefit of which could be improving your mental health. And the good news is you don’t need to be a self-professed” plant parent” to experience these benefits either. One in eight UK households don’t have access to any kind of garden. Young people and those from minority ethnic backgrounds are among those least likely to have a garden. Not having access to nature can have a number of effects on our health. It’s been linked to symptoms of depression and anxiety, as well as other health conditions, such as asthma, cardiovascular disease, and poor immune function. For many of us, houseplants are an essential link to nature. While there’s not yet a robust body of research on the mental health benefits of houseplants specifically, plenty of studies have shown how beneficial green space and gardening are for mental health. For instance, one study found that people who garden daily have better wellbeing and lower stress levels compared to those who don’t. Gardening also reduces symptoms of depression and anxiety and increases positive emotions to the same extent as biking, walking and eating out. Many of these outcomes are likely to be true of houseplants too. A recent review of 42 studies demonstrates that even just being in the presence of indoor plants can improve mental and physical health. These experiments compared participants doing various activities in rooms with or without plants. The presence of plants saw better performances on cognitive tasks involving focus, sorting or memory recall, greater pain tolerance when holding hands in ice cold water, and lower levels of physiological stress. Interestingly, the aesthetic appearance of plants is important too, with separate research showing that people tend to react more positively to lush, green plants with rounded and denser foliage. But most of these studies are centred around the mere presence of plants. From research on the benefits of gardening, we can assume that caring for houseplants will bring out many more emotional benefits- such as pride, social connection, satisfaction, fascination, mental resilience in times of stress, and may even help you heal from past trauma.... Plants can remove pollutants such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide (from nearby traffic), fine particles (from dust) and volatile organic compounds (from air fresheners, cooking and cleaning). For people indoors for the majority of the day, indoor air quality is hugely important. High concentrations of carbon dioxide can reduce cognitive performance (such as concentration and memory recall) while prolonged exposure to other indoor pollutants can cause long-term health problems- ranging from minor eye or throat irritations to respiratory problems and cancer. But removing a meaningful quantity of indoor pollutants would require a lot of plants in a very bright room- something unrealistic for most people. If you do want to give it a try, plants with a high leaf area- such as an India rubber tree (Ficus elastic) or devil’s ivy (Epipremnum aureum) are your best bet- SRCC GBO - 2026
- Reading Comprehension
Study the following charts and answer the questions that follow. Chart 1 shows the percentage of revenue generated in four quarters of the year 2020 for a company
- SRCC GBO - 2026
- Pie Charts
The table provided displays the estimated cost (in lakh) for the construction of a canal between two points. Based on the information in the table, answer the questions that follow.
The provided bar graphs outline the population and national income of a country from the fiscal years 2014-15 to 2019-20. For each of the ensuing questions, select the most suitable option.
- SRCC GBO - 2026
- Bar Graph
The following graph shows the revenue generated by three companies A, B and C in different years. Study the graph and answer the questions that follow.
- SRCC GBO - 2026
- Bar Graph