Comprehension
Read the following Passage and answer the questions below :
A TED talk (the acronym stands for Technology, Entertainment, and Design) is one of the routes to academic stardom that didn’t exist a decade ago. (The 30th anniversary celebration aside, curators only began posting fame-making free online videos in 2006.) Although TED plays an inordinate role in setting the tone for how ideas are conveyed—not only because of the reach of its videos but also through spinoffs like regional “TEDx” events and the TED Radio Hour, one of the few places nonpolicy intellectuals get substantial on-air time—it’s just one of a number of platforms that are changing the ecology of academic celebrity. These include similar ideas-in-nuggets conclaves, such as the Aspen Ideas Festival and PopTech, along with huge online courses and—yes, still—blogs. These new, or at least newish, forms are upending traditional hierarchies of academic visibility and helping to change which ideas gain purchase in the public discourse. In a famous essay, “The Unbearable Ugliness of Volvos,” first published in the early 90s, the literary scholar Stanley Fish wrote that “the flourishing of the lecture circuit has brought with it new sources of extra income ... [and] an ever-growing list of stages on which to showcase one’s talents, and geometric increase in the availability of the commodities for which academics yearn, attention, applause, fame, and ultimately, adulation of a kind usually reserved for the icons of popular culture.” Fish was Exhibit A among professors taking advantage of such trends, and his trailblazing as a lit-crit celebrity inspired the dapper, globe-trotting lit theory operator Morris Zapp, a character in David Lodge’s academic satire Small World. But the world Fish was describing, where no one could live-tweet the lectures, let alone post the talks for worldwide distribution, now seems sepiatoned. “If David Lodge’s Morris Zapp were alive and kicking today,” observes John Holbo, an associate professor of philosophy at the National University of Singapore, and blogger at Crooked Timber and the Valve, “he’d be giving a TED talk, not an MLA talk. Which is to say: He wouldn’t be doing Theory. He probably wouldn't be in an English department.
Question: 1

The passage is mainly about :

Updated On: Aug 20, 2025
  • Technology, Entertainment, and Design
  • Turning over the conventional.
  • Gaining popular adulation.
  • Changing presentations.

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 — Identify the theme of the passage:
The passage describes how new platforms such as TED talks, TEDx events, online courses, blogs, and idea festivals are reshaping the visibility of academics. These platforms provide academics with fame, applause, and attention, similar to what pop culture icons receive, thereby changing the traditional routes to recognition.

Step 2 — Contrast with the conventional system:
Earlier, academic visibility was tied to conferences like MLA talks or lecture circuits, with limited public reach. Now, the hierarchy is overturned: global platforms and social media amplify ideas in ways never possible before. John Holbo’s remark about Morris Zapp giving a TED talk instead of an MLA talk shows this sharp shift.

Step 3 — Interpretation:
Thus, the passage is not just about TED itself but about a broader phenomenon: the overturning of traditional academic hierarchies and the emergence of new routes to academic celebrity.

Step 4 — Conclusion:
The passage is mainly about turning over the conventional structures of academic visibility and recognition.

Answer: (B) : Turning over the conventional.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

The phrase “sepia-toned” implies :

Updated On: Aug 20, 2025
  • The end of an era.
  • The way things were.
  • The brown pigment.

  • The time bound nature of things

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 — Recall the phrase in the passage:
The passage says the world Stanley Fish was describing (with lecture circuits but no live-tweets or global video sharing) “now seems sepia-toned.”

Step 2 — Meaning of “sepia-toned”:
Sepia is a brownish tint often used in old photographs, giving them an antique or nostalgic look. When used metaphorically, “sepia-toned” suggests something that belongs to the past — an era that is over, remembered but no longer current.

Step 3 — Interpretation in context:
Here it means the pre-digital academic world, where talks were limited to physical audiences and not globally shared, has faded into history. Compared to today’s TED-driven online fame, that era is now old-fashioned.

Step 4 — Conclusion:
The phrase “sepia-toned” implies the end of an era.

Answer: (A) : The end of an era.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Which of the following cannot be inferred from the passage?

Updated On: Aug 20, 2025
  • TED is the future
  • Theory can no longer be counted on.

  • Philosophy is best understood through demos.

  • TED is irreplaceable
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 — Recall the main ideas:
The passage highlights TED’s important role in reshaping how academic ideas are conveyed, but it also explicitly mentions other platforms such as Aspen Ideas Festival, PopTech, online courses, and blogs. These too contribute to overturning conventional hierarchies of academic visibility.

Step 2 — What can be inferred:
- TED has become a powerful platform for academic celebrity.
- New media (blogs, MOOCs, events) have changed how ideas gain traction.
- Traditional lecture circuits now seem outdated.
- If Morris Zapp were alive, he’d likely give a TED talk instead of an MLA talk, showing TED’s prominence.

Step 3 — What cannot be inferred:
The passage never suggests that TED is irreplaceable. On the contrary, it groups TED with other platforms, showing that it is one among several shaping academic stardom. Hence, claiming TED is “irreplaceable” cannot be supported.

Step 4 — Conclusion:
The statement that cannot be inferred from the passage is “TED is irreplaceable.”

Answer: (D) : TED is irreplaceable.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions