Step 1: Analyze the purpose of each paragraph.
- The first paragraph presents generalized observations in a humorous manner, setting the tone and evoking interest. - The second paragraph elaborates on one of the observations (employee appreciation day), providing detailed reasoning and examples in a sarcastic tone.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option 1: Incorrect. The first paragraph is not redundant; it sets the context for the second paragraph.
- Option 2: Partially correct but misses the elaborative relationship between the two paragraphs.
- Option 3: Incorrect. The second paragraph does not provide evidence for all claims made in the first paragraph.
- Option 4: Incorrect. The first paragraph can stand independently, as it makes broad observations.
- Option 5: Correct. The first paragraph piques curiosity, while the second expands on a specific example, illustrating the claim.
Final Answer: (5)
Study the following question carefully and choose the right answer.
Statement: Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published?
Arguments: \[\begin{array}{|c|l|}\hline (I) & \text{No, it is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.} \\ \hline (II) & \text{Yes, it will save a lot of paper which is already in short supply.} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match the following airlines with the countries where they are headquartered.
Airlines | Countries |
---|---|
1. AirAsia | A. Singapore |
2. AZAL | B. South Korea |
3. Jeju Air | C. Azerbaijan |
4. Indigo | D. India |
5. Tigerair | E. Malaysia |
Match the following authors with their respective works.
Authors | Books |
---|---|
1. Andy Weir | A. Dune |
2. Cixin Liu | B. The Time Machine |
3. Stephen Hawking | C. The Brief History of Time |
4. HG Wells | D. The Martian |
5. Frank Herbert | E. The Three Body Problem |