\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Actions} & \textbf{Stage} \\ \hline \text{(i) Full of strange oaths} & \text{The Soldier} \\ \hline \text{(ii) Creeping like a snail} & \text{The Schoolboy} \\ \hline \text{(iii) Sighing like furnace} & \text{The Lover} \\ \hline \text{(iv) Having fair round belly} & \text{The Justice} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Step 1: Understanding the Seven Ages of Man
- Shakespeare describes seven stages in life:
1. The Infant
2. The Schoolboy
3. The Lover
4. The Soldier
5. The Justice
6. The Old Man
7. Second Childishness (Death)
Step 2: Matching Descriptions to Stages
- Full of strange oaths: Represents The Soldier, who is passionate, quick to anger, and obsessed with honor.
- Creeping like a snail: Describes The Schoolboy, who unwillingly goes to school.
- Sighing like furnace: Matches The Lover, who is deeply emotional and obsessed with love.
- Having fair round belly: Represents The Justice, who is mature, wise, and content in life.
Step 1: Understanding the First Stage (Infancy)
- An infant is helpless, relies on others for survival, and lacks speech and motor control.
- The infant is described as "mewling and puking in the nurse's arms" in the poem.
Step 2: Understanding the Last Stage (Second Childhood)
- The elderly person in the last stage is described as "Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything."
- This means that in old age, a person loses teeth, vision, and physical abilities, similar to an infant.
Step 3: Drawing Similarities
- Both lack independence and need assistance.
- Both are vulnerable and weak.
- Both struggle with communication and coordination.
Step 1: Understanding the given sentence
- The sentence "All the world's a stage" is comparing the world to a stage where people act out different roles in life.
Step 2: Identifying the figure of speech
- A simile uses "like" or "as" to compare two things, but this sentence does not contain those words.
- A metaphor directly compares two things without using "like" or "as". Since "world" is being compared to a stage, it is a metaphor.
- Personification gives human qualities to non-living things, but that is not happening in this sentence.
- Alliteration is the repetition of consonant sounds, which is not present here.
Final Answer: The sentence uses a metaphor as it directly compares the world to a stage without using "like" or "as".


When people who are talking don’t share the same culture, knowledge, values, and assumptions, mutual understanding can be especially difficult. Such understanding is possible through the negotiation of meaning. To negotiate meaning with someone, you have to become aware of and respect both the differences in your backgrounds and when these differences are important. You need enough diversity of cultural and personal experience to be aware that divergent world views exist and what they might be like. You also need the flexibility in world view, and a generous tolerance for mistakes, as well as a talent for finding the right metaphor to communicate the relevant parts of unshared experiences or to highlight the shared experiences while demphasizing the others. Metaphorical imagination is a crucial skill in creating rapport and in communicating the nature of unshared experience. This skill consists, in large measure, of the ability to bend your world view and adjust the way you categorize your experiences. Problems of mutual understanding are not exotic; they arise in all extended conversations where understanding is important.
When it really counts, meaning is almost never communicated according to the CONDUIT metaphor, that is, where one person transmits a fixed, clear proposition to another by means of expressions in a common language, where both parties have all the relevant common knowledge, assumptions, values, etc. When the chips are down, meaning is negotiated: you slowly figure out what you have in common, what it is safe to talk about, how you can communicate unshared experience or create a shared vision. With enough flexibility in bending your world view and with luck and charity, you may achieve some mutual understanding.
Communication theories based on the CONDUIT metaphor turn from the pathetic to the evil when they are applied indiscriminately on a large scale, say, in government surveillance or computerized files. There, what is most crucial for real understanding is almost never included, and it is assumed that the words in the file have meaning in themselves—disembodied, objective, understandable meaning. When a society lives by the CONDUITmetaphor on a large scale, misunderstanding, persecution, and much worse are the likely products.
Later, I realized that reviewing the history of nuclear physics served another purpose as well: It gave the lie to the naive belief that the physicists could have come together when nuclear fission was discovered (in Nazi Germany!) and agreed to keep the discovery a secret, thereby sparing humanity such a burden. No. Given the development of nuclear physics up to 1938, development that physicists throughout the world pursued in all innocence of any intention of finding the engine of a new weapon of mass destruction—only one of them, the remarkable Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, took that possibility seriously—the discovery of nuclear fission was inevitable. To stop it, you would have had to stop physics. If German scientists hadn’t made the discovery when they did, French, American, Russian, Italian, or Danish scientists would have done so, almost certainly within days or weeks. They were all working at the same cutting edge, trying to understand the strange results of a simple experiment bombarding uranium with neutrons. Here was no Faustian bargain, as movie directors and other naifs still find it intellectually challenging to imagine. Here was no evil machinery that the noble scientists might hide from the problems and the generals. To the contrary, there was a high insight into how the world works, an energetic reaction, older than the earth, that science had finally devised the instruments and arrangements to coart forth. “Make it seem inevitable,” Louis Pasteur used to advise his students when they prepared to write up their discoveries. But it was. To wish that it might have been ignored or suppressed is barbarous. “Knowledge,” Niels Bohr once noted, “is itself the basis for civilization.” You cannot have the one without the other; the one depends upon the other. Nor can you have only benevolent knowledge; the scientific method doesn’t filter for benevolence. Knowledge has consequences, not always intended, not always comfortable, but always welcome. The earth revolves around the sun, not the sun around the earth. “It is a profound and necessary truth,” Robert Oppenheimer would say, “that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them.”
...Bohr proposed once that the goal of science is not universal truth. Rather, he argued, the modest but relentless goal of science is “the gradual removal of prejudices.” The discovery that the earth revolves around the sun has gradually removed the prejudice that the earth is the center of the universe. The discovery of microbes is gradually removing the prejudice that disease is a punishment from God. The discovery of evolution is gradually removing the prejudice that Homo sapiens is a separate and special creation.
In the following figure \(\triangle\) ABC, B-D-C and BD = 7, BC = 20, then find \(\frac{A(\triangle ABD)}{A(\triangle ABC)}\). 
The radius of a circle with centre 'P' is 10 cm. If chord AB of the circle subtends a right angle at P, find area of minor sector by using the following activity. (\(\pi = 3.14\)) 
Activity :
r = 10 cm, \(\theta\) = 90\(^\circ\), \(\pi\) = 3.14.
A(P-AXB) = \(\frac{\theta}{360} \times \boxed{\phantom{\pi r^2}}\) = \(\frac{\boxed{\phantom{90}}}{360} \times 3.14 \times 10^2\) = \(\frac{1}{4} \times \boxed{\phantom{314}}\) <br>
A(P-AXB) = \(\boxed{\phantom{78.5}}\) sq. cm.