Randomness has to be dealt with successfully to ensure a better control over one’s life. Before one can deal effectively with randomness, one must acknowledge its existence.
The above statement implies the following \emph{except}:
Show Hint
When asked for “EXCEPT,” identify the option that distorts the necessary vs. sufficient condition. Here, acknowledgement was necessary, but not enough alone.
If one acknowledges the existence of randomness, one will be able to deal with it effectively.
One can deal effectively with randomness if and only if one acknowledges its existence.
Everyone lives in a random world.
If one does not acknowledge the existence of randomness, one cannot deal with it effectively.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option isB
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Identify the logic of the statement.
The passage says:
1. To control life, one must deal with randomness.
2. To deal with randomness effectively, one must first acknowledge its existence.
Step 2: Check each option.
- (A) Randomness can be dealt with effectively → This is implied, because the paragraph is about managing randomness.
- (B) If one acknowledges randomness, one will \emph{automatically} be able to deal with it → This is NOT implied. Acknowledgement is necessary, but not sufficient. (Correct answer).
- (C) One can deal effectively if and only if acknowledgement happens → Matches the passage.
- (D) Everyone lives in a random world → Supported by context of randomness being universal.
- (E) If one does not acknowledge randomness, one cannot deal with it → Matches the paragraph’s reasoning.
Step 3: Conclude.
Only option (B) overstates the role of acknowledgement, making it the “except” answer.
\[
\boxed{\text{(B) If one acknowledges randomness, one will be able to deal with it effectively.}}
\]
