Step 1: Let the number of apples be \(a\) and oranges be \(o\), with \(a+o=6\). Let the juice per apple be \(J_A\) and per orange be \(J_O\).
\[
\text{Total apple-juice} = a\,J_A, \qquad \text{Total orange-juice (needed to match)} = (a-1)\,J_O.
\]
The statement “one orange less is required to match the apples’ juice” gives
\[
a\,J_A=(a-1)\,J_O \;⇒ \frac{J_A}{J_O}=\frac{a-1}{a}.
\]
Step 2: If he used the same number \(n\) of apples and oranges in a blend, the fraction (and hence percentage) of apple juice in the blend is
\[
\frac{nJ_A}{nJ_A+nJ_O}=\frac{J_A}{J_A+J_O}=\frac{\tfrac{a-1}{a}}{1+\tfrac{a-1}{a}}=\frac{a-1}{2a-1}.
\]
Step 3: From \(a+o=6\) and the feasibility condition that he must have at least \(a-1\) oranges to “require one less orange,” we need \(o\ge a-1⇒ 6-a\ge a-1⇒ a\le 3\). Also \(a\ge 2\) (otherwise \(a-1=0\) is trivial). Hence \(a\in\{2,3\}\).
If \(a=2\), the percentage would be \(\dfrac{1}{3}=33.3%\) (one of the options).
However, the usual non-trivial balanced case with \(a=3\) (and \(o=3\)) satisfies the condition and yields
\[
\text{Apple-juice percentage }=\frac{a-1}{2a-1}=\frac{2}{5}=40%.
\]
Since \(40%\) is not among options (A)–(D), the correct choice is (E) None of the above.