Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a data sufficiency question involving mixtures, ratios, and profit. We need to determine if the given statements provide enough information to find a new mixture ratio. The key is to work with ratios and proportional values; the actual prices might not be necessary.
Step 2: Analyze the Main Question:
Let the prices of flour, cream, and sugar be \(P_F, P_C, P_S\).
Given price ratio: \(P_F:P_C:P_S = 4:10:5\). Let the prices be \(4k, 10k, 5k\) per unit weight.
Initial mixture ratio (Mix 1): Flour:Cream:Sugar = 5:3:2.
Let's find the cost price (CP) of 10 units (5+3+2) of Mix 1.
CP of Mix 1 = \(5 \times P_F + 3 \times P_C + 2 \times P_S = 5(4k) + 3(10k) + 2(5k) = 20k + 30k + 10k = 60k\).
CP per unit of Mix 1 = \(\frac{60k}{10} = 6k\).
Selling Price (SP) of Mix 1 = CP of Mix 1 = \(6k\). This is the "earlier proportions' price".
New Goal (Mix 2):
Let the new ratio be \(f:c:s\).
The SP of Mix 2 is the same as the SP of Mix 1, so \(SP_{new} = 6k\).
We want a 10% profit. This means \(SP_{new} = 1.10 \times CP_{new}\).
\[ 6k = 1.1 \times CP_{new} \implies CP_{new} = \frac{6k}{1.1} = \frac{60k}{11} \]
The cost price of the new mixture is given by:
\[ CP_{new} = \frac{f \times P_F + c \times P_C + s \times P_S}{f+c+s} = \frac{f(4k) + c(10k) + s(5k)}{f+c+s} \]
Equating the two expressions for \(CP_{new}\) and cancelling \(k\):
\[ \frac{60}{11} = \frac{4f + 10c + 5s}{f+c+s} \]
This is one equation with three unknowns (\(f, c, s\)). We need more information to find the ratio \(f:c:s\).
Step 3: Analyze the Statements:
Statement (1): The proportion of sugar should remain the same.
The proportion of sugar in Mix 1 was \(\frac{2}{5+3+2} = \frac{2}{10} = \frac{1}{5}\).
So, for Mix 2, we have \(\frac{s}{f+c+s} = \frac{1}{5}\). This gives us a second equation: \(5s = f+c+s \implies 4s = f+c\).
Now we have a system of two equations:
\(\frac{60}{11} = \frac{4f + 10c + 5s}{f+c+s}\)
\(f+c = 4s\)
Substitute \(f+c+s = 5s\) from the proportion info into equation 1:
\[ \frac{60}{11} = \frac{4f + 10c + 5s}{5s} \]
\[ \frac{300s}{11} = 4f + 10c + 5s \implies 245s = 44f + 110c \]
Now substitute \(s = \frac{f+c}{4}\) into this new equation:
\[ 245\left(\frac{f+c}{4}\right) = 44f + 110c \]
\[ 245f + 245c = 176f + 440c \]
\[ 69f = 195c \implies \frac{f}{c} = \frac{195}{69} = \frac{65}{23} \]
We have found the ratio \(f:c\). Since we also know \(s\) in terms of \(f\) and \(c\), we can find the full ratio \(f:c:s\). For example, if \(f=65, c=23\), then \(s = (65+23)/4 = 22\). The ratio is 65:23:22.
Thus, Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient.
Statement (2): The price of sugar is Rs. 30 per kg.
This information allows us to find the value of \(k\).
\(P_S = 5k = 30 \implies k = 6\).
This means we know the actual prices: \(P_F=24\), \(P_C=60\), \(P_S=30\).
The main equation becomes:
\[ \frac{60(6)}{11} = \frac{4f(6) + 10c(6) + 5s(6)}{f+c+s} \]
The factor of 6 (\(k\)) cancels from both sides, leaving us with the same single equation we had in the beginning: \(\frac{60}{11} = \frac{4f + 10c + 5s}{f+c+s}\). This is still one equation with three unknowns. Knowing the actual prices doesn't help determine the ratio.
Thus, Statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Statement (1) is sufficient, but statement (2) is not.