Step 1: Understand the trapezium structure.
We are given $PQRS$ with $PS \parallel QR$. Lines $PQ$ and $SR$ are extended to meet at point $A$ above the trapezium. We want to calculate $\angle PAS$. Step 2: Using Statement I.
- From the figure, $\triangle AQR \sim \triangle APS$ (because $PS \parallel QR$).
- This similarity gives ratio:
\[ \frac{AQ}{AP} = \frac{QR}{PS} = \frac{AR}{AS} = k \tag{1} \] Now, we are given $PQ=3$, $RS=4$, and $\angle QPS=60^\circ$. Let us drop a perpendicular from $Q$ onto $PS$, meeting at $M$. In right $\triangle PQM$: \[ \sin 60^\circ = \frac{QM}{PQ} = \frac{QM}{3} \] \[ QM = 3\cdot \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} = \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2} \] Similarly, drop a perpendicular from $R$ onto $PS$, meeting at $N$. Then $RN = QM = \tfrac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}$. Now, in right $\triangle RSN$: \[ \sin \angle RSN = \frac{RN}{RS} = \frac{\tfrac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}}{4} = \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{8} \] Hence, \[ \angle RSN = \sin^{-1}\!\left(\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{8}\right) \] Finally, in $\triangle APS$, \[ \angle PAS = 180^\circ - (\angle APS + \angle PSA) \] But $\angle APS = 120^\circ$ (straight line property at $P$ since $\angle QPS=60^\circ$) and $\angle PSA = \angle RSN$. Thus, \[ \angle PAS = 120^\circ - \sin^{-1}\!\left(\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{8}\right) \] Therefore, Statement I alone gives us a clear value of $\angle PAS$.
Step 3: Using Statement II.
If $PS=10$ and $QR=5$, then the ratio of parallel sides is $2:1$. But without knowing any angle (like $\angle QPS$), the trapezium can scale differently, so $\angle PAS$ cannot be uniquely determined.
Final Decision:
- Statement I alone $\Rightarrow$ sufficient.
- Statement II alone $\Rightarrow$ insufficient.
- Combined use is not required since I alone works.
\[ \boxed{\text{Answer: (A)}} \]
Step 1: Observe the recurrence.
The rule is: \[ A_{n+1} = A_n^2+1 \] This means once the initial term is fixed, the entire sequence is uniquely determined.
Step 2: Using Statement I ($A_0=1$).
Start with $A_0=1$: \[ A_1 = 1^2+1=2, \quad A_2=2^2+1=5, \quad A_3=5^2+1=26, \ldots \] Thus, the sequence is completely determined. With a computer or theoretical methods, $\gcd(A_{900}, A_{1000})$ can be found.
Hence, Statement I alone is sufficient.
Step 3: Using Statement II ($A_1=2$).
From the recurrence: \[ A_1 = A_0^2+1 \] So $2=A_0^2+1 \Rightarrow A_0=1$. Thus Statement II actually implies Statement I, and again the sequence is uniquely fixed. Therefore, Statement II alone is also sufficient.
Step 4: Conclude sufficiency.
Since either statement alone fixes the entire sequence and hence allows computation of $\gcd(A_{900}, A_{1000})$, each statement alone is sufficient. \[ \boxed{\text{Answer: (D)}} \]
In a sequence of numbers, each term is generated by multiplying the previous term by 2 and then subtracting 1. If the first term is 3, what is the fourth term in the sequence?
A pie chart shows the distribution of students across 5 faculties in a university. If 20% are in Arts, 25% in Science, 15% in Law, 30% in Engineering, and the rest in Commerce, what is the angle (in degrees) for Commerce?
The table given below provides the details of monthly sales (in lakhs of rupees) and the value of products returned by the customers (as a percentage of sales) of an e-commerce company for three product categories for the year 2024. Net sales (in lakhs of rupees) is defined as the difference between sales (in lakhs of rupees) and the value of products returned (in lakhs of rupees).
