Process sequence for polyester/wool blended knitted goods (Crisp handle).
A. Light brushing.
B. Open steam (allowing full relaxation).
C. Decatising.
D. Close cropping on face side of fabric.
Step 1: Understand the goal. The sequence is for finishing a polyester/wool blend knit to achieve a "crisp handle," which implies a smooth, clean surface with good dimensional stability.
Step 2: Analyze the logical order of the processes.
- B. Open steam (allowing full relaxation): Knitted fabrics are often distorted after knitting. The first step is usually relaxation to remove internal stresses and achieve a stable state. Open steaming is a common way to do this.
- A. Light brushing: After relaxation, a light brushing can be done to raise any loose fibers slightly from the surface, preparing them for the next step.
- D. Close cropping on face side of fabric: Cropping (or shearing) is cutting the raised fibers to create a clean, smooth, and uniform surface. This must be done after brushing raises the fibers.
- C. Decatising: This is a final setting process that uses steam and pressure. It imparts dimensional stability, improves the handle (feel) of the fabric, and adds a subtle luster. It is typically one of the last steps to "lock in" the desired surface and dimensions.
Step 3: Assemble the sequence. The logical flow is Relaxation \(\rightarrow\) Brushing \(\rightarrow\) Cropping \(\rightarrow\) Final Setting. This corresponds to the sequence B, A, D, C.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |