Step 1: Let Variables Represent the Scenario
Let the number of persons ahead of Pinky be \( 3x \) Let the number of persons behind Pinky be \( 5x \) (since the ratio is \( 3:5 \))
Step 2: Total Number of Persons in the Queue
Total number of persons in the queue is: \[ 3x + 1 + 5x = 8x + 1 \] We're told: \[ 8x + 1 < 300 \]
Step 3: Solve the Inequality
Subtract 1 from both sides: \[ 8x < 299 \] Divide by 8: \[ x < \frac{299}{8} = 37.375 \Rightarrow \text{Maximum integer value of } x = 37 \]
Step 4: Calculate Persons Ahead of Pinky
Using \( x = 37 \): \[ \text{Persons ahead of Pinky} = 3x = 3 \times 37 = \boxed{111} \]
\[ \boxed{\text{Maximum persons ahead of Pinky} = 111} \]
Step 1: Assume Representation
Let Pinky be surrounded by:
Total number of people in the queue (including Pinky) is: \[ 3a + 5a + 1 = 8a + 1 \]
Step 2: Apply the Total Constraint
Given: total people in the queue is less than 300: \[ 8a + 1 < 300 \Rightarrow 8a < 299 \Rightarrow a < 37.375 \] Since \(a\) must be a whole number, the maximum possible value of \(a\) is: \[ a = 37 \]
Step 3: Calculate People Ahead of Pinky
Using \( a = 37 \): \[ \text{People ahead of Pinky} = 3a = 3 \times 37 = \boxed{111} \]
\[ \boxed{111} \] is the maximum number of people that might be standing in front of Pinky.
A shopkeeper marks his goods 40% above cost price and offers a discount of 20%. What is his overall profit percentage?
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: