Step 1: Understand the process described. The process is "plying," which means combining two or more single yarns, and "twisting" them together to form a multi-ply yarn (e.g., a two-ply yarn). This is a post-spinning process to create stronger, more balanced, or novelty yarns.
Step 2: Evaluate the function of each machine.
- A. Ring frame: This machine produces single yarn from roving. It does not ply yarns together.
- B. Two for one twister (TFO): This is a machine specifically designed for plying and twisting. Several single yarns are fed from supply packages, and for every one revolution of the machine's spindle, two turns of twist are inserted into the plied yarn. It is the standard, high-production machine for this task.
- C. Yarn winding: This machine transfers yarn from smaller spinning bobbins to larger packages (cones or cheeses). While some winding machines can combine yarns (doubling), their primary purpose is not to insert high levels of twist.
- D. Speed frame: This machine produces roving from sliver. It is an intermediate process before spinning.
Conclusion: The Two-for-one (TFO) twister is the modern machine used to ply and twist single yarns together.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |