Comprehension

No one argues that the rich should be rich because they were born to wealthy parents. Critics of inequality may complain that those who would abolish inheritance taxes, say, are implicitly endorsing hereditary privilege. But no one defends hereditary privilege outright or disputes the principle that careers should be open to talents.  
Most of our debates about access to jobs, education, and public o ce proceed from the premise of equal opportunity. Our disagreements are less about the principle itself than about what it requires. For example, critics of a rmative action in hiring and college admissions argue that such policies are inconsistent with equality of opportunity, because they judge applicants on factors other than merit. Defenders of a rmative action reply that such policies are necessary to make equality of opportunity a reality for members of groups that have suffered discrimination or disadvantage.
At the level of principle at least, and political rhetoric, meritocracy has won the day. In democracies throughout the world, politicians of the center-left and center-right claim that their policies are the ones that will enable all citizens, whatever their race or ethnicity, gender or class, to compete on equal terms and to rise as far as their efforts and talents will take them. When people complain about meritocracy, the complaint is usually not about the ideal but about our failure to live up to it: The wealthy and powerful have rigged the system to perpetuate their privilege; the professional classes have gured out how to pass their advantages on to their children, converting the meritocracy into a hereditary aristocracy; colleges that claim to select students on merit give an edge to the sons and daughters of the wealthy and the well-connected. According to this complaint, meritocracy is a myth, a distant promise yet to be redeemed.

Question: 1

Read the following passage and answer the THREE questions that follow.
No one argues that the rich should be rich because they were born to wealthy parents. Critics of inequality may complain that those who would abolish inheritance taxes, say, are implicitly endorsing hereditary privilege. But no one defends hereditary privilege outright or disputes the principle that careers should be open to talents. Most of our debates about access to jobs, education, and public office proceed from the premise of equal opportunity. Our disagreements are less about the principle itself than about what it requires. For example, critics of affirmative action in hiring and college admissions argue that such policies are inconsistent with equality of opportunity, because they judge applicants on factors other than merit. Defenders of affirmative action reply that such policies are necessary to make equality of opportunity a reality for members of groups that have suffered discrimination or disadvantage.
At the level of principle at least, and political rhetoric, meritocracy has won the day. In democracies throughout the world, politicians of the center-left and center-right claim that their policies are the ones that will enable all citizens, whatever their race or ethnicity, gender or class, to compete on equal terms and to rise as far as their efforts and talents will take them. When people complain about meritocracy, the complaint is usually not about the ideal but about our failure to live up to it: The wealthy and powerful have rigged the system to perpetuate their privilege; the professional classes have figured out how to pass their advantages on to their children, converting the meritocracy into a hereditary aristocracy; colleges that claim to select students on merit give an edge to the sons and daughters of the wealthy and the well-connected. According to this complaint, meritocracy is a myth, a distant promise yet to be redeemed.
Based on the passage, which of the following inferences CANNOT be drawn?

Show Hint

When asked for the inference that \emph{cannot} be drawn, carefully locate the statement that contradicts the core argument of the passage.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • Though the wealthy can pass their advantages to their children, wealth and privilege cannot undermine meritocracy.
  • Equality of opportunity is widely accepted in principle, but there is disagreement about how to achieve it.
  • Meritocracy is seen by some as an unfulfilled promise, with the system still skewed in favour of the well-connected.
  • Hereditary privilege is not openly defended but can be perpetuated through policies like the abolition of inheritance taxes.
  • Meritocracy is a popular ideal in political rhetoric, promoted across the political spectrum.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

The question provides a passage discussing the concept of meritocracy, inheritance, and equality of opportunity, and asks which inference cannot be drawn from the text.

  1. Analyze the given options:
    • Though the wealthy can pass their advantages to their children, wealth and privilege cannot undermine meritocracy.
    • Equality of opportunity is widely accepted in principle, but there is disagreement about how to achieve it.
    • Meritocracy is seen by some as an unfulfilled promise, with the system still skewed in favour of the well-connected.
    • Hereditary privilege is not openly defended but can be perpetuated through policies like the abolition of inheritance taxes.
    • Meritocracy is a popular ideal in political rhetoric, promoted across the political spectrum.
  2. Evaluate each option:
    • Option 1: The passage mentions that meritocracy is sometimes criticized because the wealthy and powerful continue to perpetuate their advantages, suggesting that wealth and privilege can undermine meritocracy. Thus, this inference cannot be drawn from the passage.
    • Option 2: The passage explicitly states that there is disagreement about what equality of opportunity requires, confirming this inference.
    • Option 3: It is mentioned in the passage that meritocracy is often not realized as intended, thereby agreeing with this inference.
    • Option 4: The passage discusses how certain policies can perpetuate hereditary privilege, making this inference supported by the text.
    • Option 5: The passage states that politicians widely promote meritocracy, thus supporting this inference.
  3. Conclusion:

    The inference that cannot be drawn from the passage is:

    Though the wealthy can pass their advantages to their children, wealth and privilege cannot undermine meritocracy.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Identify the main theme.
The passage discusses equality of opportunity, meritocracy, and how wealth and privilege often undermine these ideals. It emphasizes that while the principle of meritocracy is widely accepted, in practice it is often corrupted by inherited advantages.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
- Option A: Incorrect inference. The passage explicitly says that wealth and privilege do undermine meritocracy by converting it into hereditary aristocracy. Hence this statement \emph{cannot} be drawn. - Option B: Correct inference. The text highlights consensus on equality of opportunity in principle, but disagreements on methods (e.g., affirmative action). - Option C: Correct inference. Many see meritocracy as an unfulfilled promise, skewed toward the well-connected. - Option D: Correct inference. Hereditary privilege is not openly defended, but the abolition of inheritance taxes is implicitly tied to perpetuating privilege. - Option E: Correct inference. Meritocracy is described as a widespread political ideal across party lines.
Step 3: Conclude.
Therefore, the only inference that \emph{cannot} be drawn is Option A.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{A}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following can be BEST concluded from the passage?

Show Hint

When asked for the “BEST conclusion,” look for the option that summarizes the central claim of the passage — here, the gap between principle and practice of meritocracy.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • Everybody admires meritocracy, until it is they or their children’s career on the line.
  • Meritocracy is a utopian system that is difficult to implement as the wealthy rigs the system.
  • In an unequal society, any attempt to execute meritocracy perpetuates inequality.
  • Meritocracy is accepted by everyone, but not understood by anyone.
  • Meritocracy is desired by everybody, but despised by those rejected by it.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

To conclude the best option from the given passage, we must analyze each choice in the context of what the passage conveys about meritocracy. The passage discusses the ideal of meritocracy, highlighting how it is generally accepted in principle but often subverted in practice due to systemic inequalities. 

  1. Analyze the provided options:
    • Option 1: "Everybody admires meritocracy, until it is they or their children’s career on the line." This does not fully encapsulate the passage's main message as it focuses more on personal discontent rather than structural issues.
    • Option 2: "Meritocracy is a utopian system that is difficult to implement as the wealthy rigs the system." This is more aligned with the passage, as it reflects the critique that the system is manipulated by the wealthy, impeding true meritocracy.
    • Option 3: "In an unequal society, any attempt to execute meritocracy perpetuates inequality." While this option touches upon inequality, the passage primarily focuses on the manipulations that arise, not just the perpetuation of inequality.
    • Option 4: "Meritocracy is accepted by everyone, but not understood by anyone." This does not match the passage's content, which focuses on the challenges in implementation rather than understanding.
    • Option 5: "Meritocracy is desired by everybody, but despised by those rejected by it." This option is personal in nature, contrasting the systemic critique presented in the passage.
  2. Conclusion:
    • After evaluating each option, Option 2: "Meritocracy is a utopian system that is difficult to implement as the wealthy rigs the system" is the best conclusion based on the passage. The passage highlights that while meritocracy is an ideal, the reality is skewed by the wealthy sustaining their advantages, making the ideal difficult to realize.

Thus, the passage illustrates that despite the widespread rhetorical support for meritocracy, practical implementation is hindered by the entrenched privileges of the wealthy, making Option 2 the correct answer.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Recall the passage’s key argument.
The passage establishes that while meritocracy is universally accepted in principle, in practice it often fails because the wealthy and powerful manipulate the system to pass on their advantages to their children.
Step 2: Evaluate options.
- Option A: Too specific and cynical; the passage critiques systemic manipulation, not individual hypocrisy. - Option B: Fits perfectly. Meritocracy is seen as an ideal (utopian) but is difficult to realize because the system is rigged in favor of the privileged. - Option C: Too extreme; the passage critiques failure to live up to meritocracy, but not that meritocracy itself perpetuates inequality. - Option D: Incorrect — people understand meritocracy; the problem is implementation. - Option E: Not accurate — the passage doesn’t frame it as “despised by the rejected.”
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, Option B captures the best conclusion.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{B}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Based on the passage, which of the following will the defenders of affirmative action identify as the main problem in the implementation of the meritocratic system?

Show Hint

In RC questions on affirmative action, always check whether the argument is about “principle vs implementation.” The defenders usually highlight systemic disadvantages being ignored.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • Meritocratic system is based on structural bias.
  • Meritocratic system intentionally favours the rich.
  • Meritocratic system supports those having hereditary privileges.
  • Meritocratic system rewards individuals based on the outcome they produce.
  • Meritocratic system does not acknowledge the initial disadvantages in opportunities.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Approach Solution - 1

To determine the main problem identified by defenders of affirmative action regarding the implementation of the meritocratic system, we need to analyze the given passage and the options provided.

Meritocracy, as explained in the passage, is an ideal where individuals succeed based on their talents and efforts, irrespective of their background. However, the passage highlights issues with how meritocracy is implemented, leading to criticisms from defenders of affirmative action. Let's evaluate the options:

  1. Meritocratic system is based on structural bias.
    While this suggests a fundamental flaw, the passage does not explicitly discuss a structural bias ingrained in the meritocratic system itself.
  2. Meritocratic system intentionally favours the rich.
    This statement implies intentional favoritism, but the passage critiques how existing systems inadvertently perpetuate privilege rather than intentional favoritism.
  3. Meritocratic system supports those having hereditary privileges.
    The passage acknowledges the criticism that the wealthy can pass on their advantages, yet it frames this as a result of rigging the system, not direct support from the meritocratic ideal.
  4. Meritocratic system rewards individuals based on the outcome they produce.
    This is more of a description of the meritocratic ideal than a problem with its implementation.
  5. Meritocratic system does not acknowledge the initial disadvantages in opportunities.
    This option aligns with the defenders of affirmative action in the passage, who argue for policies to correct for discrimination and disadvantage, highlighting an oversight of initial inequalities in opportunities.

Based on the analysis, the correct answer is: Meritocratic system does not acknowledge the initial disadvantages in opportunities. This is because defenders of affirmative action believe that to achieve genuine equality of opportunity, the system must recognize and account for initial disadvantages faced by certain groups.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Recall defenders of affirmative action.
The passage notes that critics say affirmative action is inconsistent with meritocracy, but defenders argue it is necessary to make equality of opportunity real for groups who suffer disadvantage or discrimination.
Step 2: Link to options.
- Option A: Too vague; “structural bias” is not the main phrasing. - Option B: Misleading; the system is manipulated, but not intentionally designed to favour the rich. - Option C: Overlaps with criticism, but not the defenders’ main argument. - Option D: True of meritocracy in principle, not the problem being raised. - Option E: Exactly correct. Affirmative action advocates argue that without acknowledging initial disadvantages, meritocracy simply entrenches inequality.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, Option E is the correct answer.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{E}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions