Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify a variety of apricot that is self-incompatible, meaning its flowers cannot be fertilized by their own pollen and thus require pollen from a different, compatible variety (a pollinizer) to set fruit.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's examine the options:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{1. Halman: This is a leading commercial cultivar of apricot, especially in the dry temperate regions of India like Ladakh. It is well-known to be self-incompatible and requires inter-planting with pollinizer varieties like Rakchakarpo or Suffaida for successful fruit set. } \\ \bullet & \text{2. Nari: This is another apricot cultivar, but it is not as famously self-incompatible as Halman. } \\ \bullet & \text{3. Charmagz: This is an apricot variety primarily grown for its sweet kernel, which is used as a dry fruit. It is generally self-fruitful. } \\ \bullet & \text{4. Turkey: This is a self-fruitful apricot variety. } \\ \end{array}\]
Therefore, 'Halman' is the correct answer.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Halman is a self-incompatible cultivar of apricot that requires a pollinizer.
Match List-I with List-II.\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{List-I (Crop)} & \text{List-II (Variety)} \\ \hline \text{(A) Wheat} & \text{(I) Virat} \\ \hline \text{(B) Paddy} & \text{(II) CO-86032} \\ \hline \text{(C) Sugarcane} & \text{(III) IR-8} \\ \hline \text{(D) Gram} & \text{(IV) HD-2496} \\ \hline \end{array}\]Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |