The defense that Mr. T could claim is Volenti-non-fit-injuria. This Latin maxim translates to ”to one who volunteers, no injury is done.” It means that if a person knowingly and willingly accepts a risk, they cannot later sue for damages if they are injured. In this case, Ms. J knew that Mr. T was under the influence of alcohol and still chose to ride in the lift. Therefore, she may be considered to have voluntarily assumed the risk.
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]