Question:
Match List I (General Defences in Tort) with List II (Leading Cases) and select the correct answer:
List I List II i. Act of God 1. Nichols v. Marsland (1876) 2 Ex. D. 1 ii. Consent (Volenti non fit injuria) 2. Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1933) 1 KB 205 iii. Statutory Authority 3. Vaughan v. Taff Vale Rail Co. (1860) 5 H & N 679 iv. Necessity 4. Kirk v. Gregory (1876) 1 Ex. D. 55
Match List I (General Defences in Tort) with List II (Leading Cases) and select the correct answer:
| List I | List II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| i. | Act of God | 1. | Nichols v. Marsland (1876) 2 Ex. D. 1 |
| ii. | Consent (Volenti non fit injuria) | 2. | Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1933) 1 KB 205 |
| iii. | Statutory Authority | 3. | Vaughan v. Taff Vale Rail Co. (1860) 5 H & N 679 |
| iv. | Necessity | 4. | Kirk v. Gregory (1876) 1 Ex. D. 55 |
Show Hint
Remember: Volenti → Taff Vale; Act of God → Nichols; Necessity → Kirk.
Updated On: Nov 30, 2025
- i-1; ii-2; iii-3; iv-4
- i-2; ii-3; iii-4; iv-1
- i-3; ii-4; iii-1; iv-2
- i-3; ii-1; iii-4; iv-2
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Match correctly.
i. Act of God → Nichols v. Marsland (3).
ii. Consent (Volenti) → Vaughan v. Taff Vale Rail Co. (1).
iii. Statutory Authority → Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (4).
iv. Necessity → Kirk v. Gregory (2).
Step 2: Conclusion.
Therefore, the correct mapping is option (D).
i. Act of God → Nichols v. Marsland (3).
ii. Consent (Volenti) → Vaughan v. Taff Vale Rail Co. (1).
iii. Statutory Authority → Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (4).
iv. Necessity → Kirk v. Gregory (2).
Step 2: Conclusion.
Therefore, the correct mapping is option (D).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Law of Torts
- Which of the following is not a defence to strict liability?
- TS LAWCET - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following cases are connected to Volunti Non Fit Injuria?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following are covered under the defences of nuisance?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- The principle 'Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium' means:
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- If a bailiff executes an eviction based on a civil court order later declared void for lack of jurisdiction, what protection does Section 78 of the Indian Penal Code provide?
- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- Under Section 290(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, within how many days from the date of framing of charge can an accused file an application for plea bargaining?
- AIBE - 2025
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
- According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
- AIBE - 2025
- General Law
- What is a dying declaration?
- AIBE - 2025
- Law of Evidence
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
View More Questions