Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The expected value (or mean) of a random variable Y, denoted E(Y), can be found from its moment generating function (MGF), \(M_Y(t)\). Specifically, E(Y) is the first derivative of the MGF evaluated at t=0. There seems to be a typo in the OCR for the MGF. Let's assume a more standard form like \( M_Y(t) = \frac{1}{3}e^t + \frac{2}{3}e^{2t} \), or perhaps \( M_Y(t) = (\frac{1}{3}e^t + \frac{2}{3})^k \) for some k. Based on the likely structure of such problems, let's test a simple discrete distribution. If Y takes value 1 with probability 1/3 and value 2 with probability 2/3, its MGF would be \( M_Y(t) = \frac{1}{3}e^{1t} + \frac{2}{3}e^{2t} \). Let's calculate E(Y) for this case.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
The expected value is the first moment of the distribution, which is given by the first derivative of the MGF evaluated at t=0.
\[ E(Y) = M'_Y(t) \Big|_{t=0} \]
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let's assume the random variable Y is discrete, taking value 1 with probability p and value 2 with probability (1-p). The MGF would be \( M_Y(t) = p . e^{1t} + (1-p) . e^{2t} \). The provided options are simple fractions.
Let's re-examine the OCR'd MGF: \( \frac{1}{3}e^t(e^t - \frac{2}{3}) = \frac{1}{3}e^{2t} - \frac{2}{9}e^t \). This is not a valid MGF because \( M_Y(0) = \frac{1}{3} - \frac{2}{9} = \frac{1}{9} \neq 1 \).
There must be a typo in the question. Let's assume a Bernoulli trial like structure. A common MGF is \( M_Y(t) = (q + pe^t)^n \). The options suggest a simple answer.
Let's assume the question meant a MGF for a variable that takes two values. For example, if P(Y=1)=1/3 and P(Y=2)=2/3, then \( E(Y) = 1 . \frac{1}{3} + 2 . \frac{2}{3} = \frac{1+4}{3} = \frac{5}{3} \).
Let's try another combination. If \( M_Y(t) = \frac{2}{3} + \frac{1}{3}e^{2t} \). Then \( M_Y(0)=1 \). \( E(Y) = \frac{2}{3}e^{2t}|_{t=0} = \frac{2}{3} \). This is option B.
Let's try \( M_Y(t) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}e^{3t} \). Then \( M_Y(0)=1 \). \( E(Y) = \frac{3}{2}e^{3t}|_{t=0} = \frac{3}{2} \). This is option D.
Given the ambiguity, we must deduce the intended MGF. The provided OCR is mathematically incorrect. However, if we assume the MGF represents a discrete variable taking values \(y_1, y_2, \ldots\) with probabilities \(p_1, p_2, \ldots\), such that \(M_Y(t) = \sum p_i e^{y_i t}\). For \(M_Y(0)=1\), \(\sum p_i = 1\). The provided OCR fails this. Assuming a typo and the intended MGF was, for instance, for a variable Y that is 3/2 times a Bernoulli(1/2) variable, the possibilities are too broad. Let's assume a simple structure that fits one answer. If \(M_Y(t)\) was for a variable Y with \(P(Y=0)=1/2\) and \(P(Y=3)=1/2\), then \(M_Y(t) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}e^{3t}\). Then \(E(Y) = 0 . \frac{1}{2} + 3 . \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{2}\).
Let's take the derivative of the OCR'd text and evaluate at 0 anyway.
\( M_Y(t) = \frac{1}{3}e^{2t} - \frac{2}{9}e^t \)
\( M'_Y(t) = \frac{2}{3}e^{2t} - \frac{2}{9}e^t \)
\( M'_Y(0) = \frac{2}{3}e^{0} - \frac{2}{9}e^{0} = \frac{2}{3} - \frac{2}{9} = \frac{6-2}{9} = \frac{4}{9} \). This is not in the options.
Due to the clear error in the question's MGF, there is no correct solution path. However, in an exam setting, a common form is related to Bernoulli/Binomial. If we consider a single trial where success (value 1) has probability p and failure (value 0) has probability q, but the values are scaled, such as Y=aX+b, we can get different means. Given the options, 3/2 is a possible mean. Without a correct MGF, we cannot proceed logically.
Let's assume the question meant \(M_Y(t) = (\frac{2}{3} + \frac{1}{3}e^t)^2\). This is MGF of Bin(2, 1/3). Mean would be \(np = 2/3\).
Let's assume the question meant \(M_Y(t) = (\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}e^t)^3\). This is MGF of Bin(3, 1/2). Mean would be \(np = 3/2\). This is a plausible intended question.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Assuming the question had a typo and intended to represent a Binomial(3, 1/2) distribution, the expected value would be \(np = 3 \times 1/2 = 3/2\).