Step 1: Define the Mohorovičić Discontinuity (Moho).
The Moho is the boundary surface between the Earth's crust and the mantle.
Step 2: Describe how it is identified.
It is identified by a distinct and rapid increase in the velocity of seismic waves (both P-waves and S-waves). This is because the mantle below is significantly denser and more rigid than the crust above.
Step 3: Quantify the velocity change.
P-wave (primary wave) velocity in the lower crust is typically 6.7–7.2 km/s. Upon crossing the Moho into the mantle, it abruptly increases to 7.6–8.6 km/s. Therefore, the depth where the P-wave velocity sharply increases to over 7.6 km/s is the defining characteristic of the Moho.
Conclusion: Option (B) provides the best description of this seismic velocity jump.
A magma having density of 2900 kg m\(^-3\) just reaches the surface through a two-layered crust as shown in the figure below. Assuming isostatic equilibrium, its depth of melting is .......... km. (Round off to one decimal place)
Suppose a mountain at location A is in isostatic equilibrium with a column at location B, which is at sea-level, as shown in the figure. The height of the mountain is 4 km and the thickness of the crust at B is 1 km. Given that the densities of crust and mantle are 2700 kg/m\(^3\) and 3300 kg/m\(^3\), respectively, the thickness of the mountain root (r1) is km. (Answer in integer)
For a half space composed of 3 layers with resistivities \( \rho_1 \), \( \rho_2 \) and \( \rho_3 \), as shown in the figure, which of the following statements is/are correct about the variation of apparent resistivity with electrode spacing?
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |