Question:

Match the well logging methods in GROUP I with their corresponding measured parameters in GROUP II. \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline GROUP I & GROUP II
\hline (P) Neutron log & (I) Resistivity in the flushed/invaded zone
(Q) Density log & (II) Hydrogen ion concentration in the formation
(R) Microspherically Focused Log (MSFL) & (III) Interval transit time of a compressional wave
(S) Sonic log & (IV) Electron density of the formation
\hline \end{tabular}

Show Hint

- Neutron log → porosity (via hydrogen). - Density log → electron density. - MSFL → shallow resistivity. - Sonic log → transit time.
Updated On: Aug 24, 2025
  • P – IV; Q – I; R – II; S – III
  • P – II; Q – IV; R – I; S – III
  • P – II; Q – III; R – IV; S – I
  • P – III; Q – IV; R – I; S – II
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Neutron log.
Neutron logs measure hydrogen concentration (actually hydrogen index), which correlates with porosity because hydrogen is primarily present in formation fluids. \[ \Rightarrow \text{Neutron log → (II) Hydrogen ion concentration}. \] Step 2: Density log.
Density logs measure the bulk density of formation by gamma-ray scattering. This is directly related to electron density. \[ \Rightarrow \text{Density log → (IV) Electron density}. \] Step 3: Microspherically Focused Log (MSFL).
MSFL measures shallow resistivity in the flushed/invaded zone (near-wellbore zone after mud invasion). \[ \Rightarrow \text{MSFL → (I) Resistivity in the flushed zone}. \] Step 4: Sonic log.
Sonic logs measure the travel time of compressional waves (Δt) across the formation. \[ \Rightarrow \text{Sonic log → (III) Interval transit time}. \] Final Mapping:
P – II, Q – IV, R – I, S – III Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{(B)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reservoir and channel routing

View More Questions

Questions Asked in GATE PE exam

View More Questions