Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to match different types of writers with the descriptions of their prose style and concerns as detailed in the passage.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
By carefully reading the passage, we can find the exact descriptions for each writer:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A) A Literary Writer: The passage states, "A literary writer, who has a special audience in mind, would try to convey the depth of his mind, or would use the nuances of the language..." This matches description (IV). } \\ \bullet & \text{(B) A Critic: The passage says, "A critic would set out constructing well-composed, economical sentences, without any sense of wasted effort." This matches description (III). } \\ \bullet & \text{(C) A Journalist: The passage explains, "The prose of a journalist would be guided by the requirements of the public it is addressed to; it would mostly be simple language..." This matches description (II). } \\ \bullet & \text{(D) A Student of Literary Criticism: The passage concludes, "...the main thing that a student of literary criticism cares about is the nature of the thought-content of the passage, for language must convey... the thought-content of the writer." This matches description (I). } \\ \end{array}\]
The correct pairing is therefore (A)-(IV), (B)-(III), (C)-(II), (D)-(I).
Step 3: Final Answer:
This sequence corresponds to option (B).
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]