Question:

Landline telephone sales are declining and will no longer exist in a few decades. This is because almost everyone has cellular service or is able to rely on computer systems for their personal needs. Even in workplaces, landlines are becoming obsolete.
The argument depends on which of the following?

Show Hint

When an argument makes a broad conclusion about the obsolescence of a technology based on the obsolescence of its main functions, the key assumption is that there are no other secondary but critical functions that would keep the technology in use.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
  • Workplaces are the only realm in which landlines are used.
  • Landlines will no longer be necessary for any reason aside from personal or business communication.
  • Pre-installed landlines will be eliminated.
  • Landline sales have been declining for several years now.
  • Personal landlines no longer exist.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation


Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is an assumption question. The argument concludes that landlines will cease to exist. The evidence provided is that their functions for personal and business communication are being replaced by cell phones and computers. We need to find the unstated premise that bridges this evidence and conclusion.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The argument focuses exclusively on the role of landlines in personal and business communication. However, it concludes that landlines will "no longer exist" entirely. This is a very strong conclusion. What if landlines serve other critical functions? For example, some security systems, emergency services (like 911 location accuracy), or specialized equipment might still rely on them. The argument implicitly assumes that no such essential, alternative uses for landlines exist.
Let's analyze the options:
- (A) is contradicted by the premise about "personal needs."
- (B) This statement perfectly fills the logical gap. If landlines have no other necessary function beyond the communication roles that are now obsolete, then it is logical to conclude that landlines themselves will disappear.
- (C) This is a restatement of the conclusion, not an assumption supporting it.
- (D) This is a premise of the argument, not an unstated assumption.
- (E) This is an overstatement; the argument says "almost everyone," not everyone.

Step 3: Final Answer:
The argument's conclusion that landlines will vanish depends on the assumption that their communication function is their only essential function.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0