Step 1: Analyze the relationship between the statements.
- Statement I suggests that deficient rainfall is predicted by the meteorological department, which is typically related to weather patterns or environmental factors.
- Statement II suggests that GDP growth estimates have been revised downwards by the government, which is usually influenced by economic factors such as inflation, market conditions, etc.
Step 2: Conclusion.
The two statements are not directly linked in a cause-effect relationship but are rather separate effects caused by independent factors (weather for Statement I and economic conditions for Statement II). Therefore, the correct answer is (b).
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]