Question:

Informed people generally assimilate information from several divergent sources before coming to an opinion. However, most popular news organisations view foreign affairs solely through the eyes of our State Department. In reporting the political crisis in foreign country B, the news organisations must endeavour to find out alternative sources of information.
Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the argument above?

Updated On: Oct 1, 2024
  • To the degree that a news source gives an account of another country that mirrors that of our State Department, that reporting is suspect.
  • To protect their integrity, news media should avoid the influence of State Department releases in their coverage of foreign affairs.
  • The alternative sources of information mentioned in the passage might not share the same views as the State Department.
  • A report cannot be seen as influenced by the State Department if it accurately depicts the events in a foreign country.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The argument highlights that popular news organizations often rely solely on the State Department's perspective when reporting on foreign affairs. It suggests that journalists should seek alternative sources to provide a more balanced view.

Key Inferences:

  1. C: The alternative sources of information may not share the same views as the State Department, emphasizing the need for diverse perspectives.
  2. A: Reporting that mirrors the State Department's account may be suspect.
  3. B: News media should maintain independence from State Department influence to protect their integrity.

Overall, the argument stresses the importance of diversifying sources in news reporting to avoid bias.
The correct answer is (C): The alternative sources of information mentioned in the passage might not share the same views as the State Department.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0