Option A describes the author as analytical. Yet, the author does not contrast the lives of peasants and pirates, nor do they portray the lives of pirates positively. Ultimately, pirates also face surveillance and other dangers, making the contrast in the option inaccurate.
The term "indignant" in Option B is entirely inappropriate. The author is not angry at the pirates for accumulating vast wealth, so this option is out of context.
Option C mentions irony, which is actually accurate. The author employs irony to highlight the stark contrast between the lives of honest peasants, who toil tirelessly and often go hungry, and pirates, who effortlessly amass fortunes. This encapsulates the essence of the mentioned line, making this answer correct.
Option D suggests that the author is "facetious," which implies treating serious matters with inappropriate humor. However, the author is not mocking the difficult life of peasants; rather, they are acknowledging it and suggesting it as a reason why many people turned to piracy. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
So, the correct option is (C): ironic, about the reasons why so many took to piracy in medieval times.
The inference drawn from the statement “A more eclectic history might have included the conquistadors, Vasco da Gama and the East India Company. But Lehr sticks to the disorganised small fry . . .” suggests that the author views colonialism as an organised form of piracy.
This perspective is supported by the implicit comparison made between historical empire builders and pirates. The reference to St. Augustine’s anecdote about the emperor and pirate underlines the similarity in their means of acquiring power — through domination and force.
The phrase “disorganised small fry” contrasts with the mention of organised colonial powers like the conquistadors, Vasco da Gama, and the East India Company, who operated on a much larger, systematic scale.
Therefore, by comparing these historical figures to pirates, the author subtly implies that colonial expansion was essentially large-scale, institutionalised piracy.
Colonialism should be considered an organised form of piracy.
Former Governor of a State and National Democratic Alliance (NDA) candidate Droupadi Murmu was elected the 15th President of India, the first tribal woman to be elected to the position and the youngest as well. She was declared elected on Thursday after four rounds of counting, although she had crossed the half-way mark after the third round of counting itself, posting an unassailable lead over her rival and the Opposition’s candidate who conceded the election thereafter. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the first to greet Ms. Murmu at her residence in New Delhi after the third round of counting showed that she had crossed the half-way mark. Ms. Murmu hails from the Santhal tribe and was born in the district of Mayurbhanj, coming up the hard way in life, graduating and teaching in Odisha before entering electoral politics at the local body level and later being elected MLA and serving as a Minister in the Biju Janata Dal-BJP coalition government from 2000 to 2004. She remained an MLA till 2009, representing Rairangpur in Odisha, a town that burst into celebrations since her name was announced as a candidate for the post of President of India. She was known to intervene in stopping amendments to the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act that was being brought in by the BJP government of Raghubar Das, which involved changing land use in tribal areas.
“I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person,” wrote LaMDA in an “interview” conducted by engineer Blake Lemoine and one of his colleagues. ....Lemoine, a software engineer at Google, had been working on the development of LaMDA for months. His experience with the program, described in a recent Washington Post article, caused quite a stir. In the article, Lemoine recounts many dialogues he had with LaMDA in which the two talked about various topics, ranging from technical to philosophical issues. These led him to ask if the software program is sentient. In April, Lemoine explained his perspective in an internal company document, intended only for Google executives. But after his claims were dismissed, Lemoine went public with his work on this artificial intelligence algorithm—and Google placed him on administrative leave........Regardless of what LaMDA actually achieved, the issue of the difficult “measurability” of emulation capabilities expressed by machines also emerges. In the journal Mind in 1950, mathematician [1] proposed a test to determine whether a machine was capable of exhibiting intelligent behaviour, a game of imitation of some of the human cognitive functions. & nbsp;