Option A describes the author as analytical. Yet, the author does not contrast the lives of peasants and pirates, nor do they portray the lives of pirates positively. Ultimately, pirates also face surveillance and other dangers, making the contrast in the option inaccurate.
The term "indignant" in Option B is entirely inappropriate. The author is not angry at the pirates for accumulating vast wealth, so this option is out of context.
Option C mentions irony, which is actually accurate. The author employs irony to highlight the stark contrast between the lives of honest peasants, who toil tirelessly and often go hungry, and pirates, who effortlessly amass fortunes. This encapsulates the essence of the mentioned line, making this answer correct.
Option D suggests that the author is "facetious," which implies treating serious matters with inappropriate humor. However, the author is not mocking the difficult life of peasants; rather, they are acknowledging it and suggesting it as a reason why many people turned to piracy. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
So, the correct option is (C): ironic, about the reasons why so many took to piracy in medieval times.
Option D and Option C are factually beyond the scope. There is no mention of who established the foundation for contemporary piracy, nor are there any comparisons drawn between modern piracy and its historical counterparts.
In this statement, the author is clearly not placing blame on Vasco Da Gama and the East India Company. Instead, the author seeks to emphasize their roles in the early history of piracy. Option B can be deduced from the passage.
So, the correct answer is (B): colonialism should be considered an organised form of piracy.
In the concluding remarks of the fourth paragraph, the author asserts that the "underlying reasons for piracy today mirror those from a few centuries ago." What were these reasons back then? According to the author, it was poverty. Therefore, the author contends that addressing poverty will resolve the issue. Consequently, choice C is correct. The other options are merely cited to illustrate their failure to yield the intended outcomes.
So, the correct answer is (C): if we eliminate poverty and income disparities in affected regions.
We need to select the option that isn't responsible for the increase in piracy. Option A is eliminated because it is identified as a cause. Clues from the first sentence of the fourth paragraph suggest that option C is also valid, as it is listed as a cause of piracy according to the third paragraph, which states that "the primary motivation for piracy has consistently been a combination of necessity and greed...". Additionally, hints from the fourth paragraph point to option D. Therefore, option B is the correct choice. The author maintains that surveillance can never be an effective solution because it fails to address the underlying cause.
So, the correct answer is (B): decreased surveillance of the high seas.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |