Step 1: Core holding.
In {Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala} (1973), a 13-judge bench held that Parliament’s amending power under Article 368 cannot alter the Constitution’s {basic structure} (e.g., supremacy of the Constitution, separation of powers, federalism, judicial review).
Step 2: Distinguish other famous cases.
{Golaknath} (1967) limited amendment of FRs (later reversed); {Maneka} (1978) expanded Art. 21 due process; {Bommai} (1994) checked misuse of Art. 356 and emphasized federalism—none coined the doctrine.
Step 3: Conclude.
\[
\boxed{\text{Kesavananda Bharati (Option B).}}
\]