The seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court in the State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024) case upheld the constitutional validity of sub-classification within the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories.
- This landmark decision clarified the application of sub-classification and the manner in which it can be utilized to ensure equitable representation.- Option b) is correct as it directly relates to the seven-judge bench ruling on subclassification in the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories.- Option a), E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004), does not pertain to the same issue, though it dealt with similar aspects of caste-based categorization.
- Options c) and d) also do not address sub-classification in the context mentioned in the question.
Offenses | Sections |
(A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
(B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
(C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
(D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |
(A) Conditions for a Hindu Marriage | (i) Section 13 |
(B) Registration of Hindu Marriage | (ii) Section 10 |
(C) Judicial Separation | (iii) Section 5 |
(D) Divorce | (iv) Section 8 |