Step 1: Understand the wet spinning process. This process is used for polymers that need to be dissolved in a solvent to be spun (e.g., acrylic, viscose rayon). The polymer solution is extruded through a spinneret.
Step 2: Analyze the stages. After extrusion, the filaments of polymer solution must be solidified. In wet spinning, this is done by extruding them directly into a liquid "coagulation bath."
Step 3: Define the "Wet coagulation" stage. The coagulation bath is a liquid in which the polymer is insoluble, but the solvent is soluble. When the extruded filaments enter the bath, the solvent diffuses out of the filaments and into the bath, while a non-solvent from the bath may diffuse into the filaments. This removal of the solvent causes the polymer to precipitate and solidify, forming the fiber. This stage is called wet coagulation.
Step 4: Evaluate the other options.
- Drawing: This is a later stage where the solidified fibers are stretched to align the polymer chains and improve strength.
- Span finish: This refers to applying a finish to the fiber, not solidifying it.
- Heat setting: This is a process used for thermoplastic fibers to impart dimensional stability, usually done after drawing.
Conclusion: The removal of solvent and solidification of the fiber in wet spinning occurs during the wet coagulation stage.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |