Step 1: Understand the requirement. The goal is to create a warping beam with a complex pattern of colored stripes. This means that yarns of different colors must be arranged in a specific order across the width of the beam.
Step 2: Evaluate the warping systems.
- Direct beam warping (or Beam warping): This process winds all the yarns for a beam directly from a creel onto the beam. It is very fast and efficient but is suitable for single-color yarns or simple stripe patterns. Creating a complex, multi-colored pattern is difficult and inefficient.
- Ball warping: This process creates a "rope" of yarn that is later processed. It is not used for creating patterned weaver's beams directly.
- Sectional warping (or Pattern warping): This method is designed specifically for creating complex colored patterns. The total width of the warp is divided into sections. Each section is wound onto a drum with the required color pattern. After all sections are wound side-by-side on the drum, the entire warp sheet is transferred to the weaver's beam. This allows for precise control of the color sequence.
- Warp sizing machine: This machine applies size to the yarn; it does not create the color pattern.
Conclusion: Sectional warping is the appropriate method for producing a warp beam with a complex colored pattern.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |