Step 1: Understanding the concern.
The concern about the dangers of plastic sleds is based on an increase in the number of sledding injuries. However, if most injuries occur due to collisions with objects, not the sled type, the evidence connecting plastic sleds to higher injury rates may be less compelling.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This doesn’t directly address the concern about the type of sled but simply reflects the continued use of wooden sleds.
- (B) While this suggests a lack of safety, it doesn’t directly undermine the link between plastic sleds and injury rates.
- (C) This suggests that plastic sleds can be used in more conditions, but doesn’t explain the increase in injuries.
- (D) This is the correct answer. If most injuries are caused by collisions with objects, rather than the type of sled, it weakens the argument that plastic sleds are inherently more dangerous.
- (E) This option discusses the number of children involved in an accident, but doesn’t directly address the cause of the injuries.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (D), as it suggests that injuries are caused by factors unrelated to the type of sled.