From the excerpt in the fourth paragraph, a direct inference can be drawn, {"... This led Le Boeuf and his collaborator, Lewis Petrinovich, to deduce that the dialects were, perhaps, a result of isolation over time, after the breeding sites had been recolonised. For instance, the first settlers of Alio Nuevo could have had, by chance, calls with low pulse rates. At other sites, where the scientists found faster pulse rates, the opposite would have happened—seals with faster rates would have happened to arrive first.."}.
Based on this information, the sole reason for the faster call pulse rate of male northern elephant seals in the southern rookeries could be that the male northern elephant seals of Isla Guadalupe with faster call pulse rates might have been the original settlers of this region. Option A appropriately underscores this rationale and is therefore the correct answer.
So, the correct option is (C): the male northern elephant seals of Isla Guadalupe with faster call pulse rates might have been the original settlers of the southern rookeries.
A noticeable clue to ensure that the male northern elephant seal dialects did not disappear is presented in the penultimate paragraph: ["...At the individual level, the pulse of the calls stayed the same: A male would maintain his vocal signature throughout his lifetime. But the average pulse rate was changing. Immigration could have been responsible for this increase, as in the early 1970s, 43 per cent of the males on Alio Nuevo had come from southern rookeries that had a faster pulse rate... "].
The decline in dialects is attributed to the arrival of seals with faster pulse rates. With the ongoing population growth and continuous immigration from the original population to the islands, calls across all locations would gradually revert to the average pulse rate of the founder colony. Consequently, if the individual pulse rate of immigrants varies or adjusts to match the existing population, it could maintain the dialect in a specific region. Option A encapsulates this notion, aiding in the preservation of the existing dialect within a population. Options D and B offer minimal assistance in preventing the disappearance of dialects. Conversely, Option C aligns with the passage's discussion and contributes to the regression of dialects.
So, the correct option is (A): The call tempo of individual immigrant male seals changed to match the average tempo of resident male seals in the host colony.
The quoted excerpt serves as a vital reference for contrasting the characteristics of elephant seals over time, {"... Yet there are other differences between the males from the late 1960s and their great-great-grandsons: Modern males exhibit more individual diversity, and their calls are more complex. While 50 years ago the drumming pattern was quite simple and the dialects denoted just a change in tempo, Casey explained, the calls recorded today have more complex structures, sometimes featuring doublets or triplets ….}.
During the late 1960s, elephant seal calls were characterized by a basic drumming pattern, evolving over time into calls displaying significant individual diversity and complexity. Furthermore, the dialects observed in the 1960s were absent during a study conducted in the early 2010s, suggesting a decline in regional call variations. Option C effectively encapsulates these developments.
So, the correct option is (C): The calls have transformed from exhibiting simple composition,less individual variety,and great regional variety to complex composition,great individual variety,and less regional variety.
Let's examine each statement individually:
Option A: This inference can be drawn from the second paragraph, where it's mentioned that on recently colonized islands, the tempos of male vocal displays showed stronger differences compared to those from Isla Guadalupe, the founder colony. The passage indirectly attributes the inception of eventual dialects to the dynamic changes resulting from the near extinction of elephant seals. Hence, Option A can be inferred from the passage.
Option B: This inference can be made from the mention of the increase in pulse rate in the early 1970s due to immigration from southern rookeries and the subsequent regression of calls to the average pulse rate of the founder colony as the population continued to expand and receive immigrants. Thus, Option B can be inferred from the passage.
Option C: The passage does not support or make any claim similar to Option C.
Option D: This inference can be drawn from the fourth paragraph, where it's stated that at the individual level, the pulse of the calls remained consistent, indicating that changing variables have minimal effect on the individual vocal signature of the elephant seals. Therefore, Option D can be inferred from the passage.
So, the correct option is (C): the influx of new northern elephant seals into Año Nuevo Island would have soon made the call pulse rate of its male seals exceed that of those at Isla Guadalupe.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |