Step 1: Understand the principle of the Micronaire instrument. The Micronaire test measures the fineness of cotton fibers. It works by forcing a constant volume of air at a set pressure through a "plug" of a known weight of cotton fibers compressed to a fixed volume. The instrument measures the rate of airflow (or the resistance to airflow).
Step 2: Relate airflow to fiber properties. The resistance to the flow of air depends on the total surface area of the fibers within the plug. - If the fibers are coarse (thick), for a given weight, there will be fewer fibers, and their total surface area will be lower. This creates larger channels for the air to flow through, resulting in low resistance and high airflow. - If the fibers are fine (thin), for the same weight, there will be many more fibers, and their total surface area will be much higher. This creates a denser plug with smaller air channels, resulting in high resistance and low airflow.
Step 3: Define "Specific Surface." Specific surface area is the total surface area per unit of mass (e.g., cm\(^2\)/g). Fine fibers have a much higher specific surface than coarse fibers. The airflow resistance measured by the Micronaire is directly related to this property.
Conclusion: The airflow through the fiber plug is a function of the specific surface area of the fibers.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |