In the drafting system of a ring frame, the break draft is applied between \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Understand a ring frame drafting system. A modern ring frame uses a 3-over-3 drafting system with aprons. It has three pairs of rollers: back, middle, and front. The rollers rotate at progressively faster surface speeds from back to front to attenuate (draft) the roving.
Step 2: Define the drafting zones. The total draft is divided into two zones:
- Main Draft Zone: This is between the middle rollers and the fast-moving front rollers. This is where the majority of the drafting takes place, controlled by aprons.
- Break Draft Zone (or Back Zone Draft): This is between the slow-moving back rollers and the slightly faster middle rollers. A small amount of draft, called the break draft, is applied here.
Step 3: Analyze the purpose of the break draft. The break draft's purpose is to prepare the roving for the main draft. It slightly straightens the fibers and breaks any weak points or remaining cohesion from the roving twist, allowing the main draft to proceed smoothly and evenly.
Conclusion: The break draft is applied in the back zone, which is the zone between the back and middle rollers.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |