In order to better understand conservation in China, it is essential that one has a grasp of what the term
“Chinese conservatism” means. Chinese conservatism is markedly different from the conservatism of the
modern West. The political term “conservative” came about during the French Revolution and inspired men
who were determined to preserve Christian and aristocratic elements in European society. Chinese
conservatism began around the time of the Taiping Rebellion and had as its primary objectives the preservation
of both Confucian society and non-feudal strains of pre-Opium War Chinese society. While western
conservatism believes in sacredness of private property and distrust of cosmopolitanism, the Chinese
conservatism is the defense of a rational cosmopolitan order. Thus, the only common area of agreement
between European and Chinese conservatism is the intent to conserve.
During the Tung-chin Restoration, the great aim was the revival of Confucian values and institutions. But
these aims had to be modified so that they might endure. Restoration statesmen had no desire to create
a new society – they wanted to restore a society that they believed had been based on truth. The statesmen
of the Restoration stretched the traditional ideology to its limits in an effort to make the Confucian system
under new conditions. They were true conservatives in a great tradition, living in an age when revolutionary
change was unavoidable. The aim of the Restoration was to restore to their original vitality the best of the
ancient institutions. During the Restoration, the two immediate problems were the suppression of rebellion
and the stabilization of foreign relations. In addition, the people were striving for a restoration of the system
of government by superior civil officials.
The men in the hierarchy of the Restoration rose to prominence through proven ability in both civil and
military affairs. They emphasized human and social training – that is, indoctrination, morality, and the art
of leadership through the cultivation of character. The great majority of the officials rose through the
examination system.
During the chaos of this period, the examination system had lost much of its effectiveness. This is important
and must be noted because the examination system was the traditional avenue for selecting officials. The
senior official of Restoration realized that their policies would be ineffective unless the quality of the junior
official was improved, so it was their duty to weed out the officials who had attained office in irregular ways
and to promote the examination system as the only way to high position. But these men of the Restoration
had enough foresight to determine that it was impossible to select officials automatically on the basis of
objective tests alone. As a result, the system of recommendation was ushered in, whereby; a high official
sponsored the career of a promising young man. This acted as an important supplement to the examination
system.