In nonwoven fabric manufacturing, the melt spinning process produces \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Understand the question. It asks what type of nonwoven web is produced directly from a "melt spinning" process.
Step 2: Analyze the spunbond process. The spunbonding process starts with a thermoplastic polymer (e.g., polypropylene, polyester) which is melted and then extruded through a spinneret to form continuous filaments. These filaments are then drawn (stretched), cooled, and laid down directly onto a moving conveyor belt to form a web. The process integrates spinning, web formation, and sometimes bonding into a single continuous step. This matches the description "melt spinning process produces... web".
Step 3: Analyze the other options.
- Aerodynamically formed web (Airlaid): This process uses staple fibers (short fibers), which are dispersed in a stream of air and then deposited onto a conveyor to form a web. It does not involve melt spinning.
- Mechanically formed web: This is a broad category. A common method is carding, which uses staple fibers. This is a mechanical process, not melt spinning.
- Wetlaid web: This process uses staple fibers dispersed in water, which are then filtered onto a screen to form a web, similar to papermaking. It does not involve melt spinning.
Conclusion: Melt spinning is the core of the spunbond process, which directly produces a spun bonded web.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |